Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Thanx for your great tips Buzap, i am checking the edirol one out mainly because of its size,the xenyx 1202fx seems also very compact and has all features for the price, and the new mackie pro fx8 which is not available yet looks really good! cheers Luis www.myspace.com/luisangulocom --- On Mon, 11/3/08, Buzap Buzap <buzap@gmx.net> wrote: > From: Buzap Buzap <buzap@gmx.net> > Subject: Re: Edirol M series compact digital Mixer to use with laptops >soundcards etc. > To: labaloops@yahoo.com > Date: Monday, November 3, 2008, 4:54 AM > Hi Luis > > haven't tried that particular mixer, but from similar > experience with the Mackie Onyx with Firewire, here are some > impressions: > Real mixer is great because it's WYSIWYG (what you see > is what you get). You don't have to worry about routing > paths, have direct access to faders etc. Personally, I also > have the Edirol MX-10 (mini) mixer and I like it's > quality and features. The digital mixer should have a > similar feel to it. > Then again, for a Livelooping setup, I would really prefer > a pure audio interface + midi controls. More often than > not, I found a digital mixer quite annoying with it's > limitations: Audio routing/FX sends, Panning, EQ... > Sometimes you just simply would like to be more flexible on > these things, i.e. just press a midi pedal and have a > completely different FX path, or play around with panning > using an expression pedal, or use different presets for > EQing one mic (vocal/instrument)... > If I - one day ;-) - eventually really move to a real > mobile laptop setup, this would be one of the main reasons > for me. > > If you consider alternatives, you might also want to take a > look at the new Motu Ultralite MK3 which has built-in > Compressor,EQ,Reverbs. > But I guess you have your reasons for choosing a > "real" mixer. > > good luck with your setup! > Buzap > > > -- > Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten > Browser-Versionen downloaden: > http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser