Support
Looper's Delight
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
] [
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
] [
Date Index
][
Thread Index
][
Author Index
]
Re: Rhythmic Randomness vs. Melodic Randomness
To
:
Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
From
:
"Travis Hartnett" <
travishartnett@gmail.com
>
Subject
:
Re: Rhythmic Randomness vs. Melodic Randomness
Date
:
Sun, 16 Nov 2008 06:48:27 -0800
No, it's just not "unique" at that point.
If it happens in a predictable pattern, then it's not random.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Dennis Moser
<
sinsofmachaut@gmail.com
>
wrote:
If it occurs more than once, it's no longer random.
Ta!
Dennis
Follow-Ups
:
Re: Rhythmic Randomness vs. Melodic Randomness
From:
"Dennis Moser" <sinsofmachaut@gmail.com>
References
:
Re: Rhythmic Randomness vs. Melodic Randomness
From:
"Per Boysen" <perboysen@gmail.com>
RE: Rhythmic Randomness vs. Melodic Randomness
From:
"Dave Gallaher" <micdave@hiwaay.net>
Re: Rhythmic Randomness vs. Melodic Randomness
From:
"Dennis Moser" <sinsofmachaut@gmail.com>
Prev by Date:
Re: Rhythmic Randomness vs. Melodic Randomness
Next by Date:
Re: What's experimental?
Previous by Thread:
Re: Rhythmic Randomness vs. Melodic Randomness
Next by Thread:
Re: Rhythmic Randomness vs. Melodic Randomness
Index(es):
Date
Thread
Author
