Support |
Hi Warren, Yep. I too monitor the software treated sound when doing live looping concerts. That's the point in replacing stomp boxes with at laptop. There's a delicate challenge, when programming sound patches, to get the balance right between the three poles: the direct input, the latency affected output and beat synced effects. I wouldn't say my tolerance for latency is fairly high, but having lived through years of playing electric guitar live on stage I have developed ways to adapt to latency. But I don't like it. I get a better feel playing electric guitar on rigs with small speakers because they are faster. And I like the flute because the sound source is close to my ears (once gave up the Bari sax partially for that reason). I guess my optimal instrument would be a digital brain wave converter! ;-) Per On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Warren Sirota <wsirota@wsdesigns.com> wrote: > my interface doesn't have direct monitoring, so i have to rely on the > monitor mix created by my recording software, which is at least a buffer > round-trip's worth of latency. and it's actually necessary for me, and > probably most live loopers, to monitor the actual "mix" - there's >usually no > distinction like there is in a recording studio when you're, say, >recording > a (more traditional) band live. > I guess after playing guitar synths, my tolerance for latency is fairly >high. > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:50 AM, Simeon Harris > <simeonharris40@googlemail.com> wrote: >> >> yes, but if you have an audio interface that allows direct monitoring of >> the input signal, it's not a problem (although i'm not exactly sure >what you >> mean by "monitoring" as something separate from recording) >> sim >> >> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Warren Sirota <wsirota@wsdesigns.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Simeon Harris >>> <simeonharris40@googlemail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> oh, and the buffer size for the audio interface makes a huge >difference >>>> as well. larger numbers for better performance >>>> >>> >>> and greater latency, which is no problem for recording, but might be >for >>> monitoring >>