Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
hi eben, i got one to replace my stolen echoplex, but I just use it for looping. i don't have a problem with hiss, unless that's what going into the headrush. mind you it has 2 settings when looping, and there's a trade off between loop length and sound quality. Andre http://www.andredonawa.com http://cdbaby.com/all/andredonawa http://www.myspace.com/andredonawa On Mon, December 29, 2008 8:14 am, Simeon Harris wrote: > i used to have one > didn't notice too much hiss > > the 4 outputs only work with the tape delay, which is very nice, but does > not have infinite feeback. i think the dry signal comes out of the main > out > and the delay repeats come out of the other outputs > > sim > > On Mon, Dec 29, 2008 at 4:46 AM, radio radio > <radiotelevision@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I've been thinking about getting one of these for a long time now, and >> am >> now thinking I'm either going to buy one of these now or upgrade some >> weak >> links in my current setup. Which is to say, I got a gift certificate for >> xmas and it is burning a hole in my pocket. >> I have 2 questions for anyone with experience with the headrush: >> (1) hiss? I've read some reviews that the hiss can be bad. My setup is >> mildly prone to hiss as is (and I typically take things out because hiss >> does bother me). >> >> (2) the 4 output function. This is really the only reason why I'm >> looking >> at this pedal and the main reason I'm writing this email. I want to mess >> around with recording with 4 outs and mixing them in surround. my >> question >> is how the 4 outputs, ah, output: when you play a note, does that note >> play >> through all 4 simultaneously when you play it, and THEN echo through the >> 4 >> outputs - 1234123412 etc. - or does it play through say output 1, and >> then >> echo in output 2, then 3, and so on? or something else? >> >> My idea for a setup (since I don't have 4 amps) is to play guitar --> >> amp >> --> mic --> computer/interface; then run that sound through a bus to the >> headrush, back to the computer in 4 outputs (I have a mixer if I need it >> to >> keep the levels up to line level), then bus out again through the EDP. >> That >> way I figure I can have the direct amp sound, the 4 independent echos, >> and >> the overall loop (in mono). Is this just crazy talk? My other option is >> to >> spend the money on less fun things that may be more functional (i.e., >> things >> that I wouldn't have to change my current practice to utilize, but would >> be >> less fun toys than upgrades in sound quality, etc.). It's an existential >> dilemma, in some ways... >> >> Thanks, >> Eben >> >> >> >