Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: PrePrepared vs. Improvisational Live Looping Performances



Those of you in the Los Angeles area will have an opportunity to come hear one of my approaches ... I'm going to be doing improvised looping against a field recording I recently made in Zadar, Croatia. It's about 16:20 in length and while I have listened to it several times (I did add a 5 second fade in and fade out, otherwise untouched), I have not tried playing "against" it.

Details: The Bandit Gallery, Echo Park.Saturday 1 August. Doors open at 6:30.

Hope some of you can be there and we can talk about it! (There will be a Q&A session!)

Best,

Dennis

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Rick Walker <looppool@cruzio.com> wrote:
In another thread, Matt Davignon wrote:
"On the other hand, many of the acts I've seen left me feeling like the performers are locked
into a scripted grid, with fewer opportunities to take the material in a direction other than a
previously-drawn, forward-pointing arrow from start to finish."


Honestly,  I have had the same reaction.    Granted,  there are artists who pull it off
with panache and a sense of spontaneity's (I think , specifically,  of Zoe Keating, Imogen Heap, Juana Molina and
Kid Beyond)  but in general,  pre-rehearsed and already thought out pieces of music
using live looping feel as sterile to me as people push playing on DATs, I-pods, CDs, DVDS
or computers.

I actually really and truly loved sculptured recordings but to me, the live sphere is a different thing.

And maybe this is just because I lack the discipline to go to all the work of pre arranging
pieces of music when I play, but the last ten years or so of my life have been all improvisational.

Of course,  one (and specifically, me)  run the risk of not having a cogent enough performance
or ,  worst yet in live looping,  taking too long to create a piece of music and letting it go
on for longer than it is musically interesting for the audience.  It's a constant worry for me and
I frequently blow it live.

I've noticed that a lot of loopers in our community seem to fail to realize that the what feels good
to play;   what seems like a certain length of time in developing a piece of music is completely
different for the audience.

Personally, just because I teach a lot of live looping in my hometown,   I tell newbies to set
up a clock and to force themselves to start, develop and cogentally end a piece of music
every five minutes so that they have six pieces of music in a festival set of thirty minutes.

It's a tough discipline to do that.   I purposefully write set lists with 6 to 7 tableaus in it.
I don't know what I'm going to play, but I do take 6 or 8 'sets' of instruments to each gig
so that I can keep a found sound performance intriguing.

I've discovered is someone has the discipline to play 6 five minute songs in order five times a week
that after a month, they are ready to perform a pretty interesting set as a newbie at the festival.

******
Also, and pardon this rambling post, but I"m in a 'waxing philosophic' mode today:

I'm writing some new material that is more song oriented and even (damn this is scary to admit in public)
singer/songwriter oriented,  so I know that I need to figure out a way that I can compromise my
desire for spontaneity and improvisation with composed (if not arranged)  material.

It's a really challenging thing for me.  Frankly,  it really scares me because it's so different from the freedom
I've had for ten years,  but I also am really hearing some new things with my new foray into stringed
instruments.


SOOOOO,     pros and cons..................what do y'all like and/or dislike about pre arranged live looping shows
and what do you like or dislike about pure improvisational shows.




--
http://myspace.com/usrsbin
http://audiozoloft.com
http://usrslashsbin.angrek.com/