Support |
well put!! i'm savin' this to my 'loopere' folder -----Original Message----- >From: kkissinger@kevinkissinger.com >Sent: Aug 5, 2009 10:56 PM >To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >Subject: Re: anti-looper bigots > >Quoting Brian Good <bsgood@gmail.com>: >> >> Per Boysen wrote: >> >>> Very interesting historical two cents. Wonder what those early Baroque >>> era people would think about the multi glissandi THX jingle! :-) >> >> They'd be hiding under the theater seats, I imagine. :-) >> >Actually, in the pre-Renaissance era, they chanted in parallel fifths >in a style known as "organum". (A popular example are the monks in >Monty Python -- they are chanting in organum -- stopping only to beat >their own heads with boards. I don't think the boards were authentic >-- however the organum is.) > >The reason that parallel fifths and octaves are avoided in >contrapuntal music is that this motion destroys the independence of >the voices. > >So, to baroque ears, parallel fifths would likely have sounded "old >fashioned". And, yes -- in choral singing (other than organum) a >careless (or random) parallel octave or fifth causes tuning problems >for the singers. (usually, when a choir runs across a "problem >passage" the culprit is usually a parallel fifth, parallel octave, or >some kind of poor voice-leading.) > >For any Moondog fans -- he was really into classical counterpoint and >on my Moondog CD liner notes Moondog is quoted as saying that >voice-leading was very important to him. > >The power chord is a perfect example of parallel motion -- it is >parallel motion that blends into a mass sound. That is, you don't >hear independent notes so much as one big, powerful sound. > >Popular songs such as "Iron Man" and "Smoke on the Water" derive their >sound from parallel fifths. > >Interestingly, in the twentieth century, parallelism returned as a >style. What goes around, comes around. > >Hindemith, as I recall, wished to avoid parallel octaves and fifths >because it was "old fashioned" and has an ancient sound. > >Forgive me for rambling on -- I really enjoy counterpoint and, in >fact, the countrapuntal possibilities of live-looping inspires me when >I work with loops. > >-- Kevin >