Re: david toop article - nytimes - today

[Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>]

> Per Boysen schrieb:
>>
>> In essence not far from what she tells about John Cage methods ;-)

On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Stefan Tiedje
<stefantiedje@googlemail.com> wrote:

> John Cage was not an improviser, nor did he want improvisation in his
> pieces. His work is about chance and the unforeseeable...


Yes, no one has said John Cage was an improviser! The article this
thread discussed also points that out. The similarity I mentioned is
the practicing of strategies for reaching into that realm of chance
and unforseeability. Unfortunately the link to the source article is
now lost from the thread's quote area but you should be able to find
it in the archives.

Greetings from Sweden

Per Boysen
www.boysen.se
www.perboysen.com