I think the study involved rats which are used because they have a shorter life span, which is good because I'd rather not have anything like meds tested on humans. I think he mentions the tests on a web video. The wording is mine and I can say it anyway I want, but I think that is what he has used also. Dr. Siedman can speak for himself, and it looks like he has the background to back it up. The anti-aging formula my GF uses really makes her skin soft. I don't know what it does to a rat. --Forwarded Message Attachment-- Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:42:42 -0800 From: simart@gmail.com To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Subject: Re: tmj- tinnitus I know where getting way OT here, but In American Law, substances categorized as "dietary supplements" can make claims of improving general health without proof, but not claims to the effect of treating specific diseases. http://dietary-supplements.info.nih.gov/factsheets/dietarysupplements.asp#h4 Since aging is not a disease, you could claim that your product supports the structure/function of the body and limits the effects of aging without testing it. We see claims like that all the time in American advertising. On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> wrote: On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Capt Turner <joy_top@hotmail.com> wrote: Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free. Sign up now. |