[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: Re: POLYRHYTHMIC COUNTERPOINT


I'd say 4/8+5/8 because it doesn't have a flowing idea across 9 beats.  In my mind every time signature has a unique essence and it just doesn't sound like nine.  It feels like 4 and 5.  You could notate it any way you want. 
 
t
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 2:33 AM
Subject: RE: Re: POLYRHYTHMIC COUNTERPOINT

what time sig would this song be:


just curious..especially the verses..
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Re: POLYRHYTHMIC COUNTERPOINT
From: Toby G <carpet8@mac.com>
Date: Thu, September 09, 2010 1:44 am
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com

They may not get distracted but they will count beats/pulses incorrectly.

t
----- Original Message -----
From: "Raul Bonell" <raul.bonell@gmail.com>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: Re: POLYRHYTHMIC COUNTERPOINT


related story:

once, attending to a composition workshop led by orlando jacinto
garcía (who studied with morton feldman) i asked him why he was using
*really* odd meters like 29/4 and left intentionally in silence a
bunch of bars for some parts ... i couldn't figure out how somebody
could count that at first sight or why he was not using more
efficiently the meter tool, but he told me that that was the only way
he had found to make the performers count silent bars and don't get
distracted :)


2010/9/9 Toby G <carpet8@mac.com>:
> Yeah, it bothers me when somebody says a piece is in 45/8 or some huge
> number.
>
> t
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rick Walker" <looppool@cruzio.com>
> To: "LOOPERS DELIGHT (posting)" <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2010 3:45 PM
> Subject: Re: Re: POLYRHYTHMIC COUNTERPOINT
>
>
>> Per Boysen wrote:
>>>
>>> Another one was Mike Oldfield's Tubular Bells; the first theme. Let's
>>> see... it must be 15/16. And that record was a chart topper and top
>>> seller
>>> for months!
>>
>> Yeah, wow, how could I have forgotten that famous big seller!
>>
>> I count it as 30/8
>> divided 7/8 (2+3+3) + 7/8 (2+2+3) 7/8 (2+2+3) + 9/8 (2+2+3+2)
>>
>> It might sound like splitting hairs, but the time signature is generally
>> written according to the phrasing
>>
>>
>
>



--
================================
I bé, després estava aquella dona que sense saber que estava
il.luminada, exclamava: "O siga, que he pagat per aquesta merda de
màquina i resulta que ni tan sols em diu si sóc un Buda o no, òsties!,
no podien posar-li una agulla , o que pitara, o alguna cosa així? "


Raul Bonell at Blogger: http://raulbonell.blogspot.com
Chain Tape Collective: http://www.ct-collective.com