Re: Boomerang 3 vs. Boss RC-50

[paul <phaslem@wightman.ca>]

I've had both as well. Now that version 2 of the software is out I've
sold the RC50 and kept the boomerang. Of course saving a loop was never
critical to me. For me looping has always been about the spontaneity of
what is created in the moment. If I want to save what's happening I'll
record to my minidisc recorder. I like that the Boomerang is a small
company that you can actually communicate with and that cares about your
ideas. I also like the size of the boomerang. 

Paul Haslem
www.dulcify.ca
Ontario, Canada 




At 02:45 PM 9/29/2010, you wrote:

The Boomerang is a great machine and I've definitely enjoyed messing around with it, but I think the Boss RC-50 is much better. The audio quality/preservation of the RC-50 is definitely superior to Boomerang (and storing the loops is super awesome). I've had the RC-50 for two years now and the RC-20 for six. I vote Boss.

On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Hank & Michelle <musdnc@mchsi.com> wrote:

Hi Everyone,

I'm torn between the Boomerang 3 and the Boss RC-50.  I've got a Boomerang Plus which I love, but I want stereo ins/outs so I can move my looper to the end of my signal chain.  The Boomerang would easily fit on my board, and like I said I love my Plus, but I really like the idea of being able to save my loops.

Any ideas/suggestions?

Thanks,

Hank