Re: OT: Criteria for Creating New Instruments on pad and phone technology

[Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>]

Seems interesting, but would you mind adding the video link you are
talking about?

I think iFeel technology would be better then iTouch for us musicians.
I mean, we all think it is better to feel your knobs and sliders
directly without having to look at them first. But unfortunately no
iFeel technology exists.

Greetings from Sweden

Per Boysen
www.boysen.se
www.perboysen.com
www.looproom.com internet music hub



On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Rick Walker <looppool@cruzio.com> wrote:
> Bill Putnam forwarded this thoughtful video of list of things that
> an iPhone/Touch/Pad or equivalent technology should have
> in order to be considered a serious instrument.
>
> I have to say I agreed with almost everything this guys said.
> I am brand new to the iTouch technology and have had some
> great excitement about it's potential and also a lot of strong skepticism
> about it's growing ubiquity.
>
> Your thoughts?
>
> rick walker
>
> ps though this is off topic, I do believe this new technology platform
> and it's ubiquity due to it's pretty amazingly cheap price (at least the
> apps one
> buys) has huge implications in live looping performances potentially.
>
> I'm beta testing a device now, as an example that will allow me to use an
> iTouch
> to control my Looperlative (or any midi instrument) as an example 
>remotely
> using wireless technology.
>
>