Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
|
Rick, Mark is simply stating that he likes the EDP. He gives his reasons and I for one can understand them. He is aware of the looperlative but isn't interested in spending a lot of time programming it and a midi pedal to use it. That seems straighforward. He prefers the EDP, you prefer Looperlative - like I said horses for courses. Peace Gareth > Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:39:09 -0800 > From: looppool@cruzio.com > To: buddhamachine@live.co.uk > CC: loopers-delight@loopers-delight.com > Subject: Re: RE: The EDP and the Looperlative and me > > On 7/22/64 11:59 AM, Gareth Whittock wrote: > > This looks like a strat vs sg debate to me - it's what we call horses > > for courses over here. Choose your weapon gentlemen and PLAY! > > > > > I beg to differ, with respect, Gareth. > > I truly don't care what looper Mark uses. > > It's NOT a competition or a debate. > It's trying to be accurate in writing about a powerful instrument. > > Looperlative doesn't have the public profile that Gibson had with the > EDP originally (though > Gibson horribly let the EDP down imho) so when people research it on > the web, they > come upon discussions like the one that Mark initiated. > > I disagreed with his conclusions, so I have only been trying to set the > record straight about what the LP-1 can do....... > > .......not trying to diss the EDP or win some competition. > > Come on, I've hosted hundreds of loopers from all over the world and I, > of all people, > truly believe that Music is the most important thing.............not > your equipment. > > The public at large is never going to judge someone's musical output by > whether they use software/hardware, strat/sg (lol, why doesn't > Danelectro make the > cut in that classis debate), edp, looperlative, roland, digitech, > boomerang, etc., etc. > > rick walker > |