Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: Mothership of MIDI controllers?



They had it up on a table the whole time, so it was kinda hard to tell how they would look from above, but depending on the way they program the LCD, you might could make the notation bigger, all you need is kind of a guide, not a paragraph. But from looking at it, this old fart could read them pretty well. But, that is a lot of frigging buttons!!!!!

 

 

 

From: Simeon Harris [mailto:simeonharris40@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 19, 2011 10:01 AM
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Subject: Re: Mothership of MIDI controllers?

 

my main concern was with the little LCD screens. i don't think you'd be able to read those very well, especially under bright lights. i think if they had LED's they'd be much better. i also don't like the physical size of it. i think it's way bigger than it needs to be. apart from that, it looks good, with a nice feature set

sim

On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Louie Angulo <louie.angulo@googlemail.com> wrote:

maybe the first thing would be to tell them to use quiet switches;-)
but is nice from them to ask for suggestions before they release it
maybe we should get involved.
Luis


On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Andy Owens <andy@1800dialword.com> wrote:
> Yeah I looked at that, long way to go but interesting and people were super nice.
>
> Andy Owens
> 1-800-AndyOwens
> Sent from my iPhone
> So the typing might not be my best!
>
>
> On Jan 19, 2011, at 4:18 AM, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> That's the most impressive *looking* one.
>>
>> I wouldn't risk it though,
>> it takes a lot of effort to make a controller
>> suitable for looping, and unless they set
>> aside time to do specifically that, and to get feedback from loopers their product
>> will only offer frustration.
>>
>> andy butler
>>
>> Jeff Shirkey wrote:
>>> Maybe?
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yjXe4IByTvU
>>
>
>