Support |
> Anders Bergdahl wrote: > >> sample live while it loops GOT TO BE some sort of live looping .. or >> does >> the hardware HAVE to be called a looper??) > On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 12:13 PM, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > Loopers Delight was always intended for all forms of looped > music. Yes, the folks on the L-D mailing list seems to share and exceptionally open mind! :-) A related OT: A sort of grey zone I've been thinking about a lot lately is when loops are played manually. I mean, instead of recording a part into a machine that plays it back you just keep on playing that musical part, with your instrument, over and over, like a looper. While the point in using a looping device is to give a repeating pattern a machine-like exactness the point in manually playing the loop is the opposite, to achieve an organic inexactness for a monotonic content. Isn't this rather to be described "repetitious music" or "minimal music" than "live looping"? Greetings from Sweden Per Boysen www.boysen.se www.perboysen.com www.looproom.com internet music hub