Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Sorry I keep screwing up and sending these with the return addresses: As an RC50 user. I really feel stupid for saying this because I LOVE mine. I= t does what I need it to do.=20 I've also stated that what I do I think is vastly different and more simple t= han what y'all do.=20 I do have two complaints about the unit.=20 I have freakishly tiny, monkey feet. Still yet the pedals can be hard to man= ipulate if I have shoes on. Fortunate for me I hate shoes and=20 like to wear just toe socks on stage. This is not a complaint on my end but= I would see where most would disapprove.=20 Another odd thing about this unit that I haven't seen addressed anywhere. It= 's volume increases as its loops do. That threw my sound engineer for a loop= (pun intended) I'm not down with midi. Until I see clips of Uncle Dave Macon or Grandpa Jon= es or the Ramones utilizing MIDI I don't think I'll be requiring it. I under= stand the RC50 midi sux. Perhaps. I knoweth not but it makes kick ass loops o= f my jaw harp.=20 Chaz Worm - singer, bass, banjo Earth, Worm, &, Fire and Electric Light Opry http://chazworm.com http://YouTube.com/ChazWorm On Nov 4, 2011, at 5:32 PM, William Walker <billwalker@baymoon.com> wrote: > Looking at the preliminary spec sheet for the Roland RC-300. this thing > looks like it has a lot to offer, including midi synchronization both > as a master and a slave with midi in thru and out, usb out and wav file > transfers, built in expression pedal and 2 expression pedal ports, 3 > independent tracks, 16 onboard effects, dedicated track faders an XLR > mic in w/ phantom power, true stereo operation, sub outputs and 3 hours > of memory, hell you could use it to record your jam band's 1st three > numbers:-) lets hope the midi synch is rock solid and not an > afterthought like it was on the RC-50. > Bill >