Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: OT: 24Bit/96Khz vs 16Bit/ 44.1Khz recording





I record all my gigs at 96-24. Better to archive, and better to produce, in high-res and downsample at the last stage.




On Dec 14, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Paul Richards wrote:

So, the question is: is there any advantage to recording the source at a higher rate (e.g. 24Bit/98Khz or 24Bit/44 Khz) when, ultimately, the songs will be converted to CD quality?
 
Of course, the higher rate means filling up SD cards quicker. But, they are fairly reasonable as far as cost. Opinions?
 


Truth and Fun, Inc., 484 Lake Park Ave. #102, Oakland CA 94610-2730