Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Some pretty compelling testimonials, and explanatory words from Innerclock themselves, on this page... http://innerclocksystems.com/New%20ICS%20Our%20Friends.html Phil On Jan 15, 2012, at 4:16 PM, Jeff Larson wrote: > It's hard to tell because this is one of the most poorly designed web > sites I've ever seen. But from what I was able to read within the sea > of distracting graphics it's a combination of a plugin and a hardware > device that can be used to generate a much more stable MIDI clock than > can be done in software. I think rather than using a timer in the > computer and sending MIDI through the computer, you send sync pulses as > an audio signal from the plugin out through the audio device, the > hardware then monitors this signal and generates MIDI clocks. Besides > avoiding the jittery environment within the computer this also allows > the MIDI clocks to be generated with sample accurate positioning since > the sync pulses are interleaved with the audio you hear. I'm guessing > you need a multichannel audio device, and you dedicate one channel for > the sync pulses and use the others for audible signals. I would imagine > this would be useful for anyone that wanted to combine tracks in a DAW > with patterns played by external hardware devices that follow MIDI > clocks. > > There may be more but it took me 15 minutes just to get that far. This > is a textbook example of how NOT > to design web sites that market a product. > > Jeff > > > ________________________________________ > From: Per Boysen [perboysen@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2012 5:52 PM > To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > Subject: Re: Innerclock > > On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Phil Clevenger > <phil.clevenger@gmail.com> wrote: >> Anyone have any experience using Innerclock products to better govern >> MIDI clock sync? >> >> http://innerclocksystems.com/New%20ICS%20Products.html > > > How would that be possible? I mean, the problem with MIDI clock sync > is not how it's governed but that the protocol in itself isn't very > accurate, meaning the slaving device will have to play catch-up all > the time; either it is a bit too fast and needs to slow down or it is > a bit too slow and needs to speed up. If MIDI clock doesn't sound > tight enough for your application I would rather use something else, > like for example MTC or Rewire. > > Greetings from Sweden > > Per Boysen > www.perboysen.com > http://www.youtube.com/perboysen > > >