Support |
Yes, that's correctly understood. In the first post I actually left out the last note, that the mix will become left-right reversed. If you care about that you could reverse it back to the original. It's not such a complex routing and the step for step instruction is all in my first post. But please note that it is a classic mastering technique for stereo format. Not a recommendation for mixing film music ;-) It can be used to optimize experienced detail resolution and to achieve mono compatibility in a stereo master. Greetings from Sweden Per Boysen www.perboysen.com http://www.youtube.com/perboysen On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:33 PM, andy butler <akbutler@tiscali.co.uk> wrote: > Per Boysen wrote: > > >> Here's what you do in detail by a more technical description: >> >> Ch A: Reverse stereo channels. Ch B: Invert phase. Now, when two >> channels of reversed phase play back through the same playback channel >> they nullify each other and the sum is silence. BUT here we made one >> of them stereo reversed, which means that only the audio that is mono >> - i.e. middle of stereo image - becomes nullified. Merging A + B gives >> us a "hole in the middle" stereo image. The deepness of the black hole >> and the width of the experienced stereo field depends on how you set >> the levels of these two stereo busses. My finding is that 1 dB lower >> for the phase inverted Ch B works best for the music I do (-1 dB that >> is). Now enter Ch C, the "monofied" split, and fill up that hole in >> the middle with this one. If the orignal mix is good this should stay >> at 0 dB as Ch A. > > > > So all of the trick is to make you hear the mix > differently. > > There's no way to get the original mix back with that combination. > > It's almost an implementation of a regular "shuffler", but weirded up: > > adding A and B equally gives you the classic "sides" signal, ready to mix > with the mono "center"...except that the whole result is now L<>R > reversed. > > > > > well, if it works......it's good > > > andy >