Support |
On Sun, Apr 1, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Dave Draper <dh.draper@virgin.net> wrote: > The difference for me, in improvised music, is that neither the drummer > nor > the loop is the master, rather there may be loops, there may be drum > rhythms; sometimes the drummer reacts to a loop & plays what /he(/she)/ > hears - it might not be the same rhythm/time signature that the loop was > originally played in, but it often adds a kind of rhythmic counterpoint. > My > next decision is whether to retrigger or change the loop, or more > usually, > go with the drummer's interpretation. That way we get to different places > than either of us would reach individually, or by being in a master/slave > relationship. That's a great description! I too like this approach. You really get to PLAY the looper. When I do this I restrain from creating several loops on parallel tracks and rather layer parts into the same loop. That way it is just a foot switch kick away to delete it and make a new loop. Greetings from Sweden Per Boysen www.perboysen.com http://www.youtube.com/perboysen