Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Yes, I think wiki is better. But the wiki you linked to is Wikispaces; I'm talking about Mediawiki. An example of Mediawiki is Wikipedia. Here's an example of a Mediawiki wiki. There are no loop wikis, but I'm trying to keep it relevant. Here's a general music-themed wiki. This is what it will look like; WAY different than Livelooping Wikispaces. http://www.wikimusicguide.com Very much like Wikipedia, eh? Tyler Z On Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:54:53 -0300, Matthias Grob wrote: >Tyler, >we are about to lounch the new version of livelooping.org >its not "blogger stuff" >maybe you can connect a wiki to expand it? >Bernhard started one years ago: >http://livelooping.wikispaces.com/ >I think most musicians do not know the rules to type into the wiki >the team found the best is to gather information on the forum and >transfer the >essence to the site >do you really think wiki looks better than wordpress? >On 11 Jul 2012, at 6:25 PM, Tyler wrote: >of you would want Loop Wiki; it would be an online encyclopedia by >loopers for >loopers. You see, >on this website, mailing list posts become part of the reference-work >when the >owner of the site posts them. >Well, Loop Wiki would be a place where if information needs updating, the >looper would just log into an >account, hit Edit, and change it, just like on Wikipedia. It's Web 2.0, >sonny! >Of course, this >mailing list would still be active for questions and news updates. But >this >website, you pretty much have >to email an admin for a change in the "encyclopedia" of loop topics we >have >here. Well, what about >Loop Wiki? Log in, click, edit, preview, save! We all do that, and create >a >more >Wikipedia-like community. It would be better than that Wordpress-blogger >stuff >Livelooping is doing. >Tyler Z