Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: reissue the pds8000 (or a better delay based looper)-FOLLOWUP from DIGITECH

have you messed with the eh-2880?

On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Tim Mungenast <tmungenast@verizon.net> wrote:
I used to work for Lexicon.

Their parent company, Harman (also Digi's parent co) was/is all about turning their backs n whatever cool stuff they used to do, and killing off their corporate children in a sort of white-collar Munchausen By Proxy.

I was there when the corporate suits too Lexicon off the building's exterior and replaced it with harman Specialty Group.

I was there when the suits threw historically significant prototypes into the dumpster.

I say this to illustrate what kind of people you are dealing with.





--- On Tue, 7/17/12, Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: reissue the pds8000 (or a better delay based looper)-FOLLOWUP from DIGITECH
> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> Date: Tuesday, July 17, 2012, 1:05 PM
> It's funny that Digitech snatched the
> name "JamMan" from an already
> existing looper by Lexicon and put out a new product with
> the same
> name but not as good as the (orignal) JamMan ;-)  The
> letter Scott
> received in return shows that the Digi folks do not
> understand the
> difference between these two JamMans, so to me it doesn't
> seem
> probable this company will ever produce a good looper.
>
> Greetings from Sweden
>
> Per Boysen
> www.perboysen.com
> http://www.youtube.com/perboysen
>
>