Support |
Why would you call Itunes a rapist? I don't remember an artist being treated unfairly by it. Free mp3 sites? Maybe! But Itunes? No! Tyler Z On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 04:32:52 -0800, Rick Walker wrote: >On 1/29/2013 9:39 PM, Emile Tobenfeld (a.k.a Dr. T) wrote: >>http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/29/business/media/streaming-shakes-up-music-industrys-model-for-royalties.html?ref=us >> >> >> >> >> >>*This is one of the most depressing articles I've read in a long time.** >>** >>**Does anyone remember when Colonel Tom Parker was revealed to have >>cut a deal with Elvis Presley ** >>* >*so that he would receive a usurious 50% of ALL money that Elvis made?** >** >**It was unprecedented and the rest of the music business, artists and >the public recoiled heavily from the news (though cynics always pointed ** >**out that 50% of $40 million dollars was still vastly better than 0% of >nothing).** >** >**Well folks, iTunes, one of the greatest rapists of musical >artistry, in the world charges 50% of ALL DOWNLOAD SALES.** >** >**And they are the good guys compared to Pandora and Spotify, whose >statistics make iTunes look like positive artistic ** >**philanthropists.** > >A new paradigm of selling digital content online needs to assert >itself. One that is fair to artists and all the energy >and time and money they spend trying to create art for people. > >There are rumors of this coming. I can't wait. > >Rick Walker >Fuck iTunes! Fuck Spotify! Fuck Pandora! >Fuck the dominant paradigm that says that downloading other people's >music is okay as long as you get away with it. >Theft if Theft, Folks! >*