| Lindsey,
Think of it more like an xacto knife and some splicing tape. The feature would take the knife and make two cuts, remove some small section of content; then the algorithm (the splicing tape) would join the two remaining ends from which the piece was removed.
So the thing that prevents the removed pieces from getting play time would be the fact that they are simply no longer there to be played :)
Now… what does this do to loop windowing? ;)
P I'm still thinking square waves but now with a low pass filter. Isn't that the whatchacallit that would prevent the removed pieces from getting play time? Lindsey
On Nov 1, 2013 11:43 AM, "Matthias Grob" < matilists@gmail.com> wrote:
hahaha, unfortunately its not quite correct, since its not similar to undo, no backward but forward movement
so you did not like Disect? that would be rather precise, no?
Cutaway? Cutout?
OWN a word? I'd rather own "brother-sync" but that would be screamingly absurd :-)
On 1.Nov2013, at 3:19 PM, Philip Clevenger <phil.clevenger@gmail.com> wrote:
> Unsert! Unsert! Own that new word, let's see it in the 2014 Oxford Dictionary...
>
> I unsist...
>
> Phil :)
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Nov 1, 2013, at 11:08 AM, Matthias Grob <matilists@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1.Nov2013, at 2:27 PM, Per Boysen <perboysen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>> On 10/29/2013 4:59 PM, Phil Clevenger wrote:
>>>>>> But let's say I want to remove the tiniest bits of time from a loop, at any point I so desire, for the length of a switchpress ("Remove SUS"?)...
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 4:09 PM, Matthias Grob <matilists@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> yes!
>>>> even I would be using this :-)
>>>> Unsert? Desert? or just Cut ?
>>>
>>> Uncertain, Cut off in the Desert... having no idea what to call this
>>> function. Hm... what about "annihilate"? Thats what it does -
>>> annihilates a slice inside the loop and remakes the loop as if that
>>> slice has never existed.
>>
>> disagree, nihil=nothing and we only cut a bit.
>> Desect? Cutout?
>>>
>>>> and where would it go in the user interface? another Insert option?
>>>
>>> I'd prefer a direct MIDI call, to not block any other function you
>>> might want the insert button for (in case your question was put in
>>> EDP-ish). Wouldn't people want to have Insert and Annihilate laid out
>>> on two different pedal switches in order to really go creative with
>>> it?
>>
>> sure, direct MIDI inevitably, as all the other Insert button functions
>>>
>>>
>>>> we could start a statistic in Livelooping.org where users click what tool they use and what functions in it
>>>
>>> Excellent idea! I have not checked but there must be useful Poll
>>> plugins for this in wordpress.
>>>
>>> ...
>>> Greetings from Sweden
>>>
>>> Per Boysen
>>> www.perboysen.com
>>> http://www.youtube.com/perboysen
>>
>
|
