Support |
Rusty, I just got a rang and am faced with a similar situation except mine is much simpler, I only want to run two basses (upright & resophonic bass) I just got a tone bone "bass bone" by radial that has two ins on it. Might be worth checking out some of the other stuff in the radial line up, they have a pretty cool looking "Swiss army" stereo di called the "JDI Duplex Stereo Direct Box" not sure if it's exactly what you need but might be a goo place to start. Best, Steve Uccello > On Dec 15, 2013, at 10:00 PM, Rusty Perez <rustys.lists@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > I'm preparing for a future purchase of a boomerang. > currently I only run my guitar through my looper, but I want to run > at least one more source through the looper. > > Here's my mixing setup. > > vocals, guitar, and percussion in to three chanels of my Yamaha > StagePass system. > The stagePass mixer has 7 ins, 4 mono xlr-1/4 chanels, and 3 stereo > chanels. There is no effects loop, or monitor sends. > > I'd like to run at least two sources through the boomerang, my guitar > and percussion. > I have two thoughts. Some sort of splitter for guitar and percussion > sending one in to the looper, and one in to a chanel of the mixer. > then the output of the looper would go in to a free chanel on the > mixer, but not pass live audio through the output, only looped audio. > but, what kind of equipment can I use to split my guitar signal > properly, and a mic signal properly? > > Is this making any sense at all? > > Or I could run my two sources in to left and right of the rang, and > out to the mixer, almost effectively having a separate looper for each > instrument. but then levels concern me because a mic will have > different levels than my guitar preamp, and I don't think the rang can > have separate levels for left and right. > > Also, another thought is to use a small mixer, tiny mixer, all sources > in to the rang, then one source, maybe stereo, out to the mixer. > > any thoughts? Anyone using two or more sources through the rang and > have some light to shed? > > thanks! > > rusty >