Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Yes! I am one of those people that we don't have enough of on this list. I think that looping is looping, whether it's done in real time or with a computer program when mixing. I believe that looping is looping, and some looping just happens to be live, so the Loop (music) article mentioning live looping is fine. Maybe a link to loopers-delight.com in the external links section and a few more references to famous live loopers would do. Heck, pretty soon, Per Boysen will be deserving his own article! Tyler Z On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:36:33 +0100, mark francombe wrote: >I still don't see the problem of just linking up the Live Looping page to >the >more general Loop music page. Its got everything we want there, Terry >Riley, >Fripp /Eno, even a line about Santa Cruz festivals... >Read it guys... wont it do? >http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/loop_(music) >Just cos YOUR favourite looper (box, software or musician) isn't >mentioned... >are we really so unique that we need our own page? >On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Sylvain Poitras ><sylvain.trombone@gmail.com> >wrote: >I haven't bothered with wikipedia in a while... I've used it mostly to >read-up >on tv episodes I've missed and toget a crash course on some mathematical >equations. It's quite good for both those things... >The problem with livelooping is that people who care about itare also >most >likely involved with it and have no business writing a wikipedia article >about >it. >Sylvain >-- >Mark Francombe >www.markfrancombe.com >www.ordoabkhao.com >http://vimeo.com/user825094 >http://www.looop.no >twitter @markfrancombe