Re: wikipedia page on livelooping Need Secondary Sources!

[Tyler <programmer651@comcast.net>]

If you want a site that looks just like Wikipedia but with lower 
notability standards, check out Encyc. 
They don't even have articles about most topics ... yet. Sign up, future 
editors!
http://www.encyc.org
Tyler Z
On Tue, 25 Mar 2014 10:09:48 +0000, andy butler wrote:


>On 24/03/2014 22:01, Mike wrote:
>>zippypong I believe. I probably won't be doing much additional editing 
>>on 
>>wikipedia;
>>just too much to do with Boomerang and a bunch of gigs I've come into 
>>over the 
>>last few months.
>
>Yes, it seems a bit of a lost cause.
>Once someone's decided a page isn't up to WP standard and is willing to
>delete the existing info rather than improve it there's not a lot to be 
>done.
>
>
>
>That whole academic business of referencing "reliable" sources while 
>devaluing
>logical analysis doesn't really appeal.
>
>
>Basically to prove that live looping is "notable" I'd simply quote sales
>figures for the hardware/software, I'm not interested in quoting someone's
>blog about an article in Wire ;-)
>
>
>andy
>