Re: Upper word limit?

[Ted Killian <tedkillian@charter.net>]

Hmmmm.

Then I don't know what was wrong.

Was it plain text?

Sometimes fancy formatting can mess it up too.

The Loopers Delight list was established back in 1996 and is very, very 
basic.

An ongoing problem too it that the "founder" Kim Flint, passed away a 
couple of years ago.

So no one is in charge of it anymore.

What I might suggest trying is composing a "heads-up" introductory post.

And then try posting appropriate subdivisions of it (each with clear 
headings).

Several years ago Dr. Richard Zvonar, PhD posted a history of looping on 
the site and it was quite long.

But then again, no one is at the helm.

Maybe the server is getting full.

Hope that helps.

Best,

Ted

On Sep 23, 2014, at 11:34 AM, Ivodne Galatea <takas20@hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, thanks for replying
> 
> No, it was in the body of text, but it was reasonably long. It is the 
> first part of an expansion of an ontology of looping, expressed as a 
> taxonomy of 140 lines after about 20 lines of introductory text. Should 
> I try again in chunks? I don't want to flood in a first posting or 
> anything. What is the protocol?
> 
> Thanks