Re: post your issues with loop machines

[jrploopers <jrploopers@kliklak.net>]

Thank you, Andy!
Love that EH undocumented feature, thinking to buy one actually, as the 
pitching sounds intriguing!
As for reposting the chart on livelooping.org: why not? Right now it is in 
a kind of database format, which wouldn't be easy to convert to your kind 
of html, but maybe i can make a pdf from this. 
You'll find the current version (really just a start) here:
http://www.kliklak.net/blog/looper-comparison-chart 

jayrope
---
kliklak.net
aircushionfinish.com
prinzenallee.com

On Dec 5, 2014, at 2:01 PM, Loopers-Delight-d-request@loopers-delight.com 
wrote:

> RC-50 didn't sync to incoming midi-clock ( er..you better check that, 
> I'm fairly certain)
> 
> RC-50 response to external midi commands was advertised, but the 
> implementation was vestigal,
>                        just enough of a feature to make the advertising 
> not actually a lie ...but not useable.
> 
> Vox VDL-1 does *not* do infinite overdubs as claimed. Not that you'd 
> actually want to do that.
>                    (sound quality degrades seriously after 20 layers or 
> so)
> 
> Vox VDL-1 doesn't really support series loops as is claimed. It's kind 
> of possible, but harder to do than using 2 seperate devices.
> 
> Boomerang 3 . Use of term "Brothersync" is misleading. The term was 
> coined by EDP inventor Matthias Grob to describe
>              his system where 2 devices could sync together freely both 
> ways without a master slave relationship
>              having to be established. The Rang is Master>Slave only.
> 
> and the EH Stereo MemoryMan with Hazari has a great feature which 
> *isn't* documented. When it comes out of bypass
> while there's a loop in it's memory it starts to play from the beginning 
> of the loop.
> 
> andy
> ps
> would you like to put this chart up on livelooping.org ?