Support |
I think a lot of the problem (for me) is that most of us "old timers" who've been with the list since the beginning in the '90s have become a lot less interesting, and perhaps a little introverted over time. Ennui has set in with too much of a feeling of: "Been there, done that." As for myself, posting here in the old days felt like posting to a family or group of really good, avid and like-minded friends. It was not unusual for folks to post on topics way beyond just tech-y stuff and unload a little emotionally too. Now that it's many years post 9/11 people just don't do that anymore. On the LD list, all we have are the bare words and maybe a link or two. The bells and whistles of FB allow the posting of photos, video, and audio — which can sometimes seem (on the surface) a lot more interesting to peruse on a daily basis. But over the months and years, I've found that sometimes a picture is NOT worth a thousand words. And some of the "dancing baloney" of the FB age is pretty shallow and vapid. It tends to make me want to become a hermit and hunker down in my cave and turn my back on the world. But then there are all these new exotic FX pedals (it seems like a "golden age" for that sort of thing) and looping tools are popping up everywhere. At just the point I'd want to turn my back on it, the world is becoming a lot more interesting. If only I had the energy I had 20 years ago . . . The world has spun around quite a few times since the summer of '96 too. On Feb 15, 2016, at 1:26 AM, jrploopers <jrploopers@kliklak.net> wrote: > When i had Facebok i never visited the Loopers Delight page. Now in the > "post Facebook era" it gets even more clear, that seemingly vintage > things like email newsletters are far ahead modern social media's > information policy. > > An email newsletter arrives 100%, and because i said i wanted it. > Facebook etc. instead have you waste a lot of time on the "personal > waste" of others. > The information you actually are interested in (like a page you like) > gets buried in a status stream of information you subscribed to, which > is all of your "friends"/contacts. > You end up with sleep deprivation, just because valid information almost > never arrives :D > > jayrope > --- > www.kliklak.net/jayrope/ > www.aircushionfinish.com > www.soundcloud.com/jayrope > www.ello.co/jayrope > > On Feb 14, 2016, at 5:53 PM, Tyler Zahnke wrote: > >> I know, the loopers haven't been posting very often. In 2012, a member >> told me that it was because of the Looper's Delight Facebook group, >> that many members prefer Facebook, but the vintage 1996 mailing list >> will always stay up because vintage sites are cool to some people, >> such as me. >> Tyler Z >> >> >> On 2/14/16, Jeff Duke <jeffloops@gmail.com> wrote: >>> And receiving! Funny that until I posted I hadn't gotten an LD email >>> since >>> Per's post on the 12th. So just checking. >>> >>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 11:41 AM, Ted Killian <tedkillian@charter.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hearing loud and clear. >>>> >>>> On Feb 14, 2016, at 8:15 AM, Noah Peterson <noah@noahpeterson.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Check one two. Check one two. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Sent via the Samsung GALAXY S® 5, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -------- Original message -------- >>>>> From: Jim Goodin <jimgoodinmusic@gmail.com> >>>>> Date: 14/02/2016 9:32 AM (GMT-06:00) >>>>> To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com >>>>> Subject: Re: testing >>>>> >>>>> I echo the testing back Jeff! >>>>> >>>>>> On Feb 14, 2016, at 10:07 AM, jrploopers <jrploopers@kliklak.net> >>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Testing back ;) >>>>>> jayrope >>>>>> --- >>>>>> www.kliklak.net/jayrope/ >>>>>> www.aircushionfinish.com >>>>>> www.soundcloud.com/jayrope >>>>>> www.ello.co/jayrope >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Feb 14, 2016, at 3:52 PM, Jeff Duke wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ah, ok, thanks!! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Sun, Feb 14, 2016 at 9:49 AM, Tyler Zahnke < >>>> programmer651@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> You're coming in loud and clear! >>>>>>> Tyler Z >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 2/14/16, Jeff Duke <jeffloops@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> this is only a test >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >