Support |
Yeah, I too regret selling mine! ;-( Even though I liked the EDP better, those two boxes, EDP + Repeater, was a very powerful duo in tandem. Running the EDP as the temp sync master and slaving the Repeater. You could keep abusing it to get cool sounds, in a way that if you do it in software it kills the OS or the application. Greetings from Sweden Per Boysen www.perboysen.com www.boysen.se On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:12 AM, Simeon Harris <simeonharris40@googlemail.com> wrote: > yes, version 2 is amazing. here is a link to the manual for it…check it > out! > - > https://www.dropbox.com/s/yaogg3pgpde2lt5/Repeater%20Software%20V2.01%20Manual.pdf?dl=0 > > i really regret selling mine :O( > > > On 21 Mar 2017, at 05:32, mark francombe <markfrancombe@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2.0 rocks! Can't remember 1 > > Sent from my (advertisement removed) > > On 21 Mar 2017, at 04:33, Jeff Larson <jeff.larson@sailpoint.com> wrote: > > Hi everyone, I'm emerging from hibernation for a bit and I have a > question. > > > I bought a Repeater awhile ago out of curiosity and am thinking about > sending it off to Condor for the usual hardware and software upgrades. > I'm > toying with software emulation, but I know enough about pitch shifting > algorithms to admit I probably won't come close to duplicating that. > Still, > I'd like to understand how the basic control flow of the Repeater works. > Everyone wants the hardware noise mods. But is the 2.x software upgrade > something everyone would want or are there folks that prefer the original > 1.x version? I'd rather not mess with both versions, but as my wife > reminds > me, my life's calling seems to be providing complicated free software to > dozens of people :-) > > > Thanks, > > Jeff > > >