Re: AW: Electrix Announces....

[mark sottilaro <marksottilaro@sbcglobal.net>]

Hm, I could be wrong, but with the Repeater some blank
space is put before and after each loop so that you
can go back and tweak your loop in and out point. 
This takes time and is what currently makes it
impossible to go directly into record.  I'd easily
lose the loop tweak functions as I find the LPA (loop
point assist) stretching function to work fine for me.
 All this speculation!  Exciting times though.

Mark

--- Luca Formentini <luca@unguitar.com> wrote:

> right Rainer !
> I agree
> luca
> 
> www.unguitar.com
> 
> Rainer Thelonius Balthasar Straschill wrote:
> 
> >Yet, for me, only providing the possibility to go
> directly into overdub
> >after recording a loop would be "a big jump forward
> from the
> >functionality of the original unit".
> >
> >-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> >Von: Travis Hartnett [mailto:tiktok@sprintmail.com]
> 
> >Gesendet: Samstag, 15. Januar 2005 17:49
> >An: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
> >Betreff: Re: Electrix Announces.... 
> >
> >
> >I'm no accountant, but maybe they managed to wave
> the magic wand of 
> >debt restructuring so now they have no R&D costs to
> recoup?  And yeah, 
> >it's probably made in China now to lower
> manufacturing costs.
> >
> >After filtering marketing speak, their description
> of the new version 
> >sounded to me like "Fixed some bugs in OS 1.1 and
> put a pretty 
> >faceplate on".  More power to them if that's true,
> but I'm not 
> >expecting a big jump forward from the functionality
> of the original 
> >unit.
> >
> >
> >On Jan 15, 2005, at 8:39 AM, 
> >Loopers-Delight-d-request@loopers-delight.com
> wrote:
> >
> >  
> >
> >>From: "jondrums" <jondrums@hotmail.com>
> >>Date: January 14, 2005 10:08:57 AM PST
> >>To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
> >>Subject: Re: Electrix Announces....
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>always plenty of them).  If Electrix lost money
> manufacturing these 
> >>>things and selling them for $300-400 how are they
> going to make any 
> >>>money selling them this time around?
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>Maybe they moved production offshore and reduced
> manufacturing cost on
> >>them? One would hope that they've tackled the
> little problem of making
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >  
> >
> >>a profit...
> >>Jon
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >
> >.
> >
> >  
> >
> 
>