[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: EchoplexDP Plus: "tick-tick-tick" noise problem



This "tick-tick-tick" noise problem sounds like a Repeater when playing
sounds off the CFC. Maybe -- I´m just speculating -- the memory sticks
installed in this particular EDP are too slow and hence produce some kind 
of
"scanner" noise? I´m no tech at all, I´m just speculating, so please don´t
take my ramblings for granted.

Stephen.


____________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________

"Our land is a rape machine, I´d go outside if it looked the other way. You
wouldn´t believe the things they do." (Gary Numan / "Down in the Park")

Visit the official [´ramp] website at www.doombient.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Cox" <dougcox@pdq.net>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2005 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: EchoplexDP Plus: "tick-tick-tick" noise problem


> I'm very sorry that I'm late in posting to this thread.
>
> I think the EDP knows when a "Cox" owns it, and does this :)  Actually,
> mine is MUCH worse, when it occurs.  Those pops sound like explosions on
> my EDP.  On my unit, it only happens after some serious overdubbing,
> multiplying, and next-looping.  But I have done all of the tests
> mentioned (and more) and I can confirm beyond a shadow of a doubt that
> it is internal to the EDP, and is not heat related (I've had it happen
> on the first loop of the day on a unit that has been powered down all
> night).
>
> Kim Flint suggested that I try new memory, and I've yet to get that
> done.  I *have* swapped memory between my 2 EDPs (didn't help), but
> they're both the same memory type, and I suspect it may be realted to
> the fact that they are the 8 chip variety vs. the 2 or 3 chip.  So, in
> the end, I can't help much on a fix, but I CAN confirm that this happens
> on one of my EDPs also.  Just worse - much louder and nastier.
>
> I will post Kim's reply to my questions here, in case it helps.  I'm
> sure that he won't mind:
>
> Hi Doug-
>
> I don't see anything from your setup that would cause the problem. It is
> likely some hardware issue with that unit.
>
> There may be a few things you can do before sending it to somebody. You
> could try reseating any of the IC's that are in sockets, sometimes they
> get dirty or corroded with time and cause strange behavior like this.
> Carefully pull them out of the sockets, clean the pins as you did, and
> reinstall them. Often that is enough to make the electrical contacts
> good again if they have gotten flaky.
>
> Another rare possibility could be a problem with one of the memory
> simms. You might try replacing them if you can get your hands on some
> 4MB 30pin simms, and see if that helps. I recommend simms that have 2 or
> 3 chips on them. (the 8/9 chip variety has on rare occasion caused
> problems, so you might as well not take the chance.) I most recently got
> these from Kahlon:
> http://www.kahlon.com/category.asp?catID=1#4
>
> Otherwise you will need to send it to somebody for repair. You would
> have to contact Gibson for that. Ultimately the person you want is Shane
> Radtke, who I assume they will direct you to. I'm not sure if he still
> works for gibson. His service company is
http://www.britishaudioservice.com
>
> kim
>
> Cox wrote:
>
> >Ok, I will try to anwer your questions;
> >
> >1 - I have posted the Wave sound, it's here :
> >http://www.familoo.com/familoo/RepFiles/9042563465/tick-01.wav . It's
> >another loop. the input knob was not at its minimum, that's why you can
here
> >some sound in the background (a mic was plugged in).
> >
> >2 - I 've tried several times, and each time the noise came by groups of
> >four, always separated by the same time of silence (or almost?)
> >
> >3 - By "swapping the memory around", you mean to invert the position of
the
> >memory simms? If that's it, I will try tomorrow( it's already 1AM here 
>in
> >France...)
> >
> >4 - I've tried with several loops, and it seems to be the same with 
>every
> >loop; sometimes it apears on loop 1 and only, and sometimes in other
loops
> >too, sometimes in other loops and not in loop 1...
> >
> >.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>