Support |
On Thu, 15 Jan 1998, Fmplautus wrote: > <<Many people seem to have developed a knee-jerk reaction to the >presence > of data compression, but I think that a lot of that is people listening > to the spec sheet instead of with their ears. > >> > > The LoOpDoctOrs don't agree...we listen with our ears and we hear that >hard > disc recording kills what we can afford for analogue and we love the >freedom > allowed by our computer. > > However, we find it alarming that manufacturers will play God with >recorded > human history. And we have been around recording long enough to remember > "perfect sound forever," the initial hype when Phillips/Sony introduced > digital. It turned out to be far from perfect and the forever part only > applies to the painful aural butchery that that was made immortal in >early > digital recordings. > > In short, we trust our ears and nobody's spec sheets. And we are HIGHLY > suspicious of faux scientific explanations as to why we should accept >"less" > as "more." That includes marketing/compression schemes. Bang for the >buck is > one thing, but don't tell our ears they're related to jerky knees. The > "twitch factor" for marketing types with profit line incentives is much >higher > then the > "knee jerk" factor in musicians. > Umm, so are the Loop Doctors saying that they actually hear a degradation in sound from the compression schemes used in MiniDisc recording? -Adam --- "...if one strives at hearing for the sake of constant virtue, out of seeking liberation from cyclic existence, gradually one becomes a Hearer." - Chandrakirti