Support |
>Date: Tue, 03 Feb 1998 13:06:40 >To: "Stephen P. Goodman" <sgoodman@earthlight.net> >From: andre <andre@monmouth.com> >Subject: Re: Frippery vs. Bitchery > >At 06:44 AM 1/31/98 -0800, you wrote: >>You know, at no point in this strangely looping discussion has anyone >talked >>about the idea that - wonder of wonders! - perhaps RF LIKES what he's >doing >>right now...! > > >wheeeew!! RELAX - no-one ever questioned whether RF likes wht hes doing, >of course he does... altho, in the new 'nightwatch' notes - he seems unable to decide which is more torture, playing crim music, or waiting for it to be played... re-read my note (BELOW) - at the risk of sounding pompous, i thought i was quite respectful, and accepting of whatever he has to offer, just a comment. > >> >>I believe we've all been there, hm? But if you're looking for blazingly >>fast technique guitar, > >WOW!!! what a jump!!%%@?? !! No - just something that we all don't do >while warming up our gear, reading a manual or something. There's a lot of leeway there. He's a nut, that's all. and i love him, but lets not play hero worship. > >go listen to one of the fellows from the G3 tour. > >who are all excellent, diverse players, despite silly generalizations > >> >>Who ever said it was supposed to be exciting ALL the time anyway? > >no-one did. but fripp's music usually is, to me. And i love all the >ambient stuff - evening star, index, the exposure CD, League stuff, all of it. I just think that - though i enjoy the CDs of the last couple years (soundscapes) greatly, on stage - it's just a boring waste. I'm sorry to piss you off, really. i want this to be a loving list. > >Not to mention- we all missed 90% of his show because we dared to SHOW UP ON TIME and not an hour or more earlier, when the gates were opened at G3.. I only wish i had seen one of the shows where Mike Keneally jammed along w/ RF.. > >>into this whiningly annoying bit. It smacks a bit of the Satriani-heads >who >>were also disappointed in Soundscape works. Oh brother, whatta buncha >>consumers THEY are. :) > >what's a "satriani-head"?? someone who can appreciate his very diverse music, and also love ambience and sparse use of notes?? because that's what i am. You're doing the exact thing you claim to despise... It's all music. Actually have you heard - "woodstock Jam" on Satch's Time machine CD, or anything from the "Joe Satriani" CD of last year??? I regularly play that for satch-haters - the first is an OUT jam with doug wimbush and simon phillips, the 2nd a very bluesy record with nathan east, etc. 100% of the time, guitarists cannot identify it - because they have put the guy in a box as a "shredder" and only a shredder. > > >for reference - below is my post....as well as pete's. to be honest - i don't even know if your ire was directed at me - but i had to go to bat for JS. Ironically, you seem to forget that he's a huge Crimson/Fripp fan, duh, that's why he got him on the tour... Fripp himself has said that he made more per show on G3 than a week of KC shows... so the "satch-heads" may have helped us ALL by financing some frippery... > >again - i am a fripp freak. i love basically all guitar music, i try to keep an open mind, even about stuff i'm not supposed to like... > >>>>..whatever... i agree - it's some of fripp's most..... non exciting >stuff. >>>>but , yes, i respect the fact - that was what he was going for.. but on >>the >>>>2 soundsscape CDs i have , plus the G3 show, it never seemed to take >off, >>>>beyond simplistic, basic synth patches thru cool stereo FX. not as >>>>adventurous as he usually is, by far! >>>> >>>>andre' >>>> >>>> >>> >>>This is a good point. Fripp does rely too much on synth patches. Now >that >>>can sometimes work very effectively such as on A Blessing of Tears, but >>more >>>often than not it just gets cloying. I would like to see him use the >>>natural sound of the guitar more - essentially i would like him to sound >>>like a guitarist, rather than a keyboard player. >>> >>>Pete >> >