Support |
Well, I was just about to buy an Akai MPC2000 (v1.7 OS has seemed to fix most of the stability issues), then Ensoniq announced the ASR-X Pro (the red box). It seems like they've addressed almost everybody's major complaints except the small screen issue and real-time sample stretch. Can anyone point out any compelling reason to go with one over the other. To me, it seems like the ASR-X Pro is a winner ... (has anybody heard anything about Yamaha's up-and-coming competitor to these units, I think it's called the RU700?? It's due to be released this Fall.) Feature MPC2000 ASR-X Pro ===================================================== Flash OS yes yes(finally) Polyphony 32 32 # channels Rx 1 32 16 # channels Tx 32 16 Sequencer Tracks 64 16 MIDI outs 2 1 Max audio outs 2 2 RAM 2mb (32 max) 2mb (66 max) Total sample time ??? 13 minutes @ 44.1 kHz mono 6.5 minutes @ 44.1 kHz stereo ROM sounds no yes (even more with EXP expansion board) Storage floppy, SCSI floppy, SCSI (built-in now) SMPTE yes no # Pads 16 13 (plus 10 quick edit pads) Graphic editing yes no Step edit yes no read PC (fat) disks yes yes Effects Algoritms ?? with add-in 40 Effects Busses 4 busses 2 busses Resonant filter 12db/Oct LP Multimode (LP, BP Resonant) Track muting yes no Sequencer memory 100,000 notes 140,000 notes (w/ 8Mb RAM) Save File Formats .WAV & .AIFF .AIFF CC modulation yes(effects only) yes(4 per patch) Time Stretch yes yes Tempo Resolution ??? 1/100 BPM Clock Resolution 96/ppq 384/ppq Tap Tempo yes yes Note Repeat yes(easy) (???) I think so with some playing around Velocity sensitive pads no yes Hmmmm, I wonder how these units compare to a Yamaha A3000 or an Emu ESI-4000 ... if I could find a great pad based MIDI controller, that may be a better way to go. Later- Doug.