Support |
Message is undeliverable. Reason: Too many file attachments. Please send separate messages with less than 20 attachments. Original text follows: ---------------------
Received: from chaos.wg.com by smtp.wg.com (ccMail Link to SMTP R6.01.01 BETA) ; Wed, 10 Mar 99 16:38:09 -0500 Return-Path: <Loopers-Delight-d-request@annihilist.com> Received: from rosy.yourwebhost.com (rosy.yourwebhost.com [209.239.39.1]) by chaos.wg.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with SMTP id RAA11854 for <schiller@wg.com>; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 17:05:17 -0500 (EST) From: Loopers-Delight-d-request@annihilist.com Received: (from kflint@localhost) by rosy.yourwebhost.com (8.8.7/8.8.4) id RAA10888; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 17:15:19 -0500 Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 17:15:19 -0500 Message-Id: <199903102215.RAA10888@rosy.yourwebhost.com> X-Authentication-Warning: rosy.yourwebhost.com: kflint set sender to Loopers-Delight-d-request@annihilist.com using -f Subject: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V99 #96 X-Loop: Loopers-Delight-d@annihilist.com X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight-d@annihilist.com> archive/volume99/96 Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/digest; boundary="----------------------------" To: Loopers-Delight-d@annihilist.com Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com ------------------------------ Content-Type: text/plain Loopers-Delight-d Digest Volume 99 : Issue 96 Today's Topics: Re: EchoPlex [ Chuck Zwicky <chuck.zwicky@wavefron ] Re: Akai MPC 2000 [ Cummings <r_t_cummings@csi.com> ] RE: Are computers "real life?" [ Tim Nelson <tcn62@ici.net> ] Re: Bad memory warning [ Crossedout@aol.com ] Loops & such... [ Stevaum@aol.com ] RE: EchoPlex [ "Mike McGary" <mcgary@metronet.com> ] loop subtraction [ "Mike McGary" <mcgary@metronet.com> ] video loop effecting audio loop affe [ Stevaum@aol.com ] RE: Akai MPC 2000 [ "Jonathan El-Bizri" <jonathan@full- ] Re: loop subtraction [ "Dennis W. Leas" <dennis@mdbs.com> ] Re: Bad memory warning [ murkie <murkie@panther.middlebury.e ] Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V99 #92 [ "BOB HENRY" <BOBH@knme1.unm.edu> ] Video Looping [ "BOB HENRY" <BOBH@knme1.unm.edu> ] Re: LOADS OF DELAY LINES [ Gareth Whittock <whiteoak@dial.pipe ] questions [ ENAT21213@aol.com ] RE: loop subtraction [ "Mike McGary" <mcgary@metronet.com> ] Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V99 #92 [ Kim Flint <kflint@atitech.com> ] Re: loop subtraction [ Chris Chovit <cho@newdream.net> ] Re: loop subtraction [ landman@wco.com (Mark Landman) ] jamman in stereo? [ ENAT21213@aol.com ] Re: Great music from Crevice [ Edward_Chang@amsinc.com ] Administrivia: Looper's Delight **************** Please send posts to: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Don't send them to the digest! To subscribe/unsubscribe to the Loopers-Delight digest version, send email with "subscribe" (or "unsubscribe") in both the subject and the body, with no signature files, to: Loopers-Delight-d-request@annihilist.com To subscribe/unsubscribe to the real Loopers-Delight list, send email with "subscribe" (or "unsubscribe") in both the subject and the body, with no signature files, to: Loopers-Delight-request@annihilist.com Check the web page for archives and lots of other goodies! http://www.annihilist.com/loop/loop.html Your humble list maintainer, Kim Flint kflint@annihilist.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 01:51:37 -0600 From: Chuck Zwicky <chuck.zwicky@wavefront.com> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: EchoPlex Message-Id: <3.0.6.32.19990310015137.007ac100@POP.VISI.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" The EDP does forward or reverse only. At 12:37 AM 3/10/99 -0600, you wrote: >Maybe some of you EDP'ers can answer this for me: Can the echoplex do >backward/forwards looping, or is it forward only? That would seem to be a >fairly trivial thing to implement (at least in software, don't know if the >hardware would support it.) and I would probably sell my first child to >get >one if it did. ;) What I am looking for specifically, is something w/ the >memory/power of an EDP that does bi-directional looping (forward, backward >& forward/backward). > >Thanks, > > >Lorren Stafford >Richard For Cerebellum/A Most Happy Sound >http://www.winternet.com/~r4c > >"We ask ourselves whether truly this is the beginning >of a new world or whether perhaps the world...is about >to perish. There are people who earnestly and seriously >fear this, where music becomes the slave of the machine..." > > > ........................................................................... But they are useless. They can only give you answers. -Picasso, on computers. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:11:09 +0100 From: Cummings <r_t_cummings@csi.com> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Akai MPC 2000 Message-ID: <36E6534D.FB42E3C4@csi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sorry if I was misleading there - no the mpc2k is not much of a real-time machine. It's not a looper, but rather a glorified sampling drum machine. But a good one. I've prepare multi-tracked sequences ahead of time and play live to these or process them. There is a tap tempo button which I understand can also be accessed by footswitch (see Simon's post earlier on this thread). I've also used the mpc2k in live contexts with other musicians sorta like a dj - matching tempos etc. This takes a little practice but it work quite well. I was often frustrated looping live percussion via microphones into the Jamman - either the loop would feedback or I would get too much stage sound in the loop. I suppose these "mistakes" can be interesting things, too - maybe I'll be able to integrate that later. -the man cable- Jonathan El-Bizri schrieb: > > Please tell me more! Can you sample and loop back live? Does it have > adequate midi implementation (could I use a midi pedal to sample/tap > tempo/etc, like a super fat echoplex?) I still haven't got my replacement > looping device after selling my Jam-man (something I regret, though I >got a > good price for it) and a sampler that can sample and playback in real >time > would be very exciting. > > bIz > > > > > The mpc2k has now supplanted the Jamman as the most important > > part of my > > live setup. The mpc2k is more or less well-designed and is > > really steady > > time-wise. As a drummer/percussionist I find that I'm getting more > > effective results with the mpc2k than with the old Jamman. It has this > > really great feature which allows you to mute up to 64 (!) tracks > > on/off. Maybe I'll get around to combining them someday - > > look at all my > > machines mom! > > > > -the man cable- > > > > > MARK FRANO schrieb: > > > > > > Loopdy loops, One of the more interesting and extremely > > hifi machines > > > available for looping is the Akai mpc2000. Certainly more > > designed for > > > dj's, it is not as conducive to ambient looping but with 32 megs of > > > RAM she's long on memory and is designed to loop samples. I think it > > > would be an excellent studio tool weather your looping > > beats or other > > > noise. Alas, no footswitch makes it difficult to wield an intrument > > > and interface easily with the MPC2000.Still an interesting > > candidate. > > > Hi Fi Bugs. > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 07:20:27 -0800 From: Tim Nelson <tcn62@ici.net> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: RE: Are computers "real life?" Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990310072027.007a5100@pop.ici.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sure, "real artists with heart use anything, they need, to paint the world", but I don't see it as out of place for those "real artists" to share tips and tricks with each other, especially when it can save one (or many) of the "real artists" the time, money and frustration that goes with committing themselves to the purchase of a system which may not be suited to their particular needs. One of the biggest advantages of a list like this one is that it's a forum where we can help each other out. This thread started with a legitimate question and has (mostly) consisted of useful, well-intentioned posts from people who were trying to benefit the looping community by sharing their experiences with the gear and approaches they use to "paint the world." Sometimes this takes the form of a pro-con discussion. If you see this as ignorant, or if you construe list members' equipment/technique-related posts as a "shit fit", well sorry. But do we need a "really cool comment" saying "duh" when informing us ignoramuses what "real artists" should do/say/think? C'mon, this is nothing to have a flame war over! Tim >At 11:23 PM 3/9/99 -0800, you wrote: >>Really cool comment. Vimana, you're totally right. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: vimana [mailto:vimana@webtv.net] >>Sent: Tuesday 09 March 1999 10:34 AM >>To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com >>Subject: Re: Are computers "real life?" >> >> >>just cuz 1 person asked "why" people use dedicated loopers everybody has >>a shit fit,big hairy deal. how ignorant is this >>question........................computers vs. rack >>loopers???????duh.......................................................real >>artists with heart use anything,they need,to paint the >>world....................................................................... >>..ps..our >>brains are computers >>vim@innertemple studios >> >> >> ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 08:37:46 EST From: Crossedout@aol.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Bad memory warning Message-ID: <4d1dbd59.36e675aa@aol.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/10/99 2:10:16 AM Central Standard Time, kflint@annihilist.com writes: << To help people out, could some of you who have bought memory successfully in recent months suggest quality vendors? >> There is a national chain called Computer Renaissance that sells new and used computers and components, and I have picked up memory for my computer and memory for my sampler, all at very good prices, and have had no problems with either. I was also warned while buying that the Asian recession has put a lot of smaller chip makers out of business, so the price of RAM may start creeping back up as the companies that are still afloat realize it's a smaller playing field with less competition. So you might want to grab some (good) chips sooner rather than later. - Crossedout@aol.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:13:13 EST From: Stevaum@aol.com To: tcn62@ici.net, Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Loops & such... Message-ID: <38c81283.36e67df9@aol.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Hi Tim, Thanx for yr inquiry regarding video looping (Loopers-Delight-d Digest Volume 99 : Issue 91). Before I joined the Loopers Delight web group, I consulted with Kim & Chris about the appropriateness of discussing video in a predominantly audio environment. For me, the word "loop" immediately conjures visions of looping video systems!!! Looping is looping whatever the medium! I am very spontaneous and have employed a large variety of concepts and techniques working with video and audio looping systems. I have not done any video looping pieces since 1983 because I no longer have access to any reel- to-reel video equipment. Being that I thoroughly explored the medium back when it was current technology, I've been happy to move along and continue to create with whatever is the latest technology has to offer! I have continued to explore video feedback, but have not explored any digital means for video looping. I have used all types of video, including looping pieces, during live performances. Often I use prerecorded video during live music performances, but have done many live video/audio looping performances & installations. The video loops, on occasion, have used prerecorded (& found footage) tapes, but are usually done with live cameras. The source of change comes from video feedback, when the camera is zoomed within the frame of the video monitor screen; and from performance, when the camera is zoomed beyond the frame of the video monitor screen. (refer to my Loopers Delight Profile for an explanation of the basic video system I used) There is always overlap between siys & pupaum (siys=visual/pupaum=audio), because much of my art is multimedia. Glad to hear u enjoyed the art on my website! Stevo ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:15:28 -0600 From: "Mike McGary" <mcgary@metronet.com> To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> Subject: RE: EchoPlex Message-ID: <000601be6b08$d4b69b00$526ad0d0@Ugh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > What I am looking for specifically, is something w/ the > memory/power of an EDP that does bi-directional looping (forward, >backward > & forward/backward). The Echoplex has a function that can cause the current loop to reverse. This function can be mapped to the 'insert' button on the footpedal if you are someone who uses it alot. I keep mine mapped to the insert button. With multiple loops activated, you can lay down a 'base' pattern, jump to the next loop (copying that pattern as you move), reverse it, overdub a pattern on top.....jump to the next pattern (w/ copy), reverse it... the 'base' pattern is now back with the second pattern reversed. You can reverse the entire loop at any time...as many times as you like. But you cannot have it move forward through the loop and then backward through it, ad infinitem. Fun stuff.... -Mike McGary ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:20:23 -0600 From: "Mike McGary" <mcgary@metronet.com> To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> Subject: loop subtraction Message-ID: <000701be6b09$84c78ae0$526ad0d0@Ugh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Just a thought.... Long ago I worked with an FFT that would show you a graphical depiction of the current sound source (SoundForge has this in their 4.5 version). One of the features of the hardware FFT was the ability to 'subtract' sounds. If you had a sound that had an overpowering 600hz section, you could put it in subtract mode...play a 600hz sound....and the resulting sound was the original minus the 600hz sound (kind of a follow-me EQ...) Wouldn't it be slick to have a looping device that allowed this? You start a base pattern....play some parts on top of it and build it's thickness....and then 'subtract' out the base pattern by playing it again. (excuse my ignorance if there is already a device like this and everybody already knows about it....slap me if my echoplex already does it) -Mike McGary ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:55:04 EST From: Stevaum@aol.com To: dmgraph@pulsewidth.com, Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: video loop effecting audio loop affecting video loop affecting audio loop... Message-ID: <8b1f0bb3.36e695d8@aol.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Regarding David Myers' inquiry about "realtime video output from audio sources" (Loopers-Delight-d Digest Volume 99 : Issue 91/Subject: Re: Any Video Loopers?), I thought you might be interested to hear about a couple of vintage projects I did in the early 80's. In early '81, I was living in Norman, Oklahoma collaborating with an ever changing & expanding group of artists/musicians. We would change our name & members for every improvisational music project we created. In late March I was awarded a full scholarship to get a Masters degree at The Art Institute of Chicago, & in April we began a month long marathon of projects before I moved. One of these projects was "Monitor Control/Control Monitor". It consisted of three musicians spontaneously performing while I video taped the performance. I had developed this technique of spontaneously zooming & panning a video camera based on what was happening musically. The musicians would be conducted by the movement of the video camera displayed on a monitor before them, & I would be influenced how to shoot the video based on the music performance. The audio was recorded using a tape loop system. The end results were both interesting & rewarding! We successfully created a "performance/documentation loop"!!! Another project, done with two other artists at the Art Institute of Chicago in 1982, was "Night Emerges Day" (it was thusly titled, as we had spent all night setting up the equipment, & finally were recording the piece as the sun was rising!). A real-time video art piece consisting of an audio & video loop, using a custom modular EMU synthesizer & the Sandin Image Processor (IP), mixed with Zgrass computer animation (Zgrass was the first computer hardware & software designed specifically for art & animation). The EMU was sending control voltage to the IP, affecting the oscillation of image & color, while the IP was sending control voltage to the EMU, affecting the frequency of pitch & filter. Again, the results were extremely interesting & rewarding! We had successfully created a "live interactive technology loop"!!! For me, "looping" exists in many forms! Stevo Wolfson sTeVo iN yR sTuDiO Pupaum http://www.angelfire.com/il/StevoInYrStudio/index.html stevaum@aol.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 09:09:43 -0800 From: "Jonathan El-Bizri" <jonathan@full-moon.com> To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> Subject: RE: Akai MPC 2000 Message-ID: <001a01be6b18$cb1e99c0$26ee8fd1@jelbizri.linkexchange.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Too bad :< I was hoping it would have one of those 'realtime sample' functions that djs use. bIz > > Sorry if I was misleading there - no the mpc2k is not much of a > real-time machine. It's not a looper, but rather a glorified sampling > drum machine. But a good one. > ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:03:52 -0500 From: "Dennis W. Leas" <dennis@mdbs.com> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: loop subtraction Message-Id: <36E6A5F8.48D@mdbs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mike McGary wrote: > > Wouldn't it be slick to have a looping device that allowed > this? You start a base pattern....play some parts on top of it > and build it's thickness....and then 'subtract' out the base pattern > by playing it again. Interesting idea. This is why I have two EDPs. I use the midiclock to synchronize them. I lay down the "base pattern" in one and the "frills" in the other. Then I mute/stop/turn-down the "master" EDP. To me, what you're describing is a sort of "multi-track" looper. I know, for example, I could never duplicate a part accurately enough to "subtract" it out. Of course, any artifacts from the process might be interesting of themselves. - Dennis Leas -- dennis@mdbs.com ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:43:06 -0500 From: murkie <murkie@panther.middlebury.edu> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Bad memory warning Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990310124306.007ab9e0@panther.middlebury.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 11:33 PM 3/9/99 -0800, you wrote: >So be warned - there is a remarkable amount of bad memory out on the >market >right now. um, i was going to mention this but i kept... what was i talking about? m ===================================================================== = = = M a r k C h r i s t e n s e n = = Cramped Quarters Studio / Jasperpottamus Music Publishing = = internet: murkie@middlebury.edu = = http://www.middlebury.edu/~mchriste/murkie.html = = = ===================================================================== ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 10:59:23 GMT+7 From: "BOB HENRY" <BOBH@knme1.unm.edu> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V99 #92 Message-ID: <29882276ECE@knme1.unm.edu> Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 14:42:11 -0600 From: "Michael S. Yoder" <myoder@tamiu.edu> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Are computers "real life?" Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19990308144211.008303d0@tamiu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Sunday March 7, Javier Miranda V. wrote the following in response to a message by Bob H.: >I highly object to your judgement about computers not being part of real >life. Just because they didn't exist when you were a kid doesn't make >them >less real. When your great-grandfather was a kid there were no cars! >That >doesn't mean that they are not as real to you as the horse-and-buggy. > Don't inflict on others the concept that "life" is only what "you" >think it >is, dude. (Bob H. reply to Javier Miranda V.) Are you some kind of IDEOT or what??? You go right ahead and "Highly Object" to what I said. Fact is, that little tight-holed anus-sphincker boys such as yourself have such a little mind, that you had to take offense at a statement that I made. I wasn't even talking to you, anyway! Get up out'cha chair and away from your friggen puter and just take it like a man...quit cher whinin and bellly-achin! Now- I'm not that old, punk! As you can see, I use a computer everyday, so I have PLENTY of room to speak about the subject. Not only that, but, Dude, you know absolutely NOTHING about me. So don't go making accusations that I'm some kind of "old Fart" (or whatever). Fact is, that computers WERE around when I was young...they still are! So- just what do YOU know about computers anyway, exept what resides in front of you with a mouse and keyboard and all the latest software upgrades that the techno-computer media throws at'cha from dat to day? You tell me in detail about how computers got where they are today...I'm sure you don't know! Myself- I just don't look at computer technology as some relegious shrine- that to disagree with it is somehow "sacreligious". Lately, I've had way too much digital crap crammed down my throat and I sure as hell don't need some computer techno-dweeb punk like Javier Miranda try'n ta put me down! Javier, next time ya have a gripe, ya better state in a more dignified way...know what the HELL your talk'n about B4 you state your opinion! For those of you who have read this, please understand- I don't have a problem with computer technology...it's the attitude towards it, as you have just seen with Javier Miranda. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:18:54 GMT+7 From: "BOB HENRY" <BOBH@knme1.unm.edu> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Video Looping Message-ID: <298D5225B4E@knme1.unm.edu> Hi Steve- R U interested in video looping with tape or computer-based? Video tape delays had been utilized some years ago by using 2 open reel machines and cross-taping from the record machine to the other. I understand that this was rather avengard or rarely used, since it was so involved. To make an actual tape loop, would be quite impratical, since the splice would have to be flawless so as not to cause a video glitch in the picture. A control track would have to be recorded first, then possibly, the video could just be recorded in an "insert" mode fashion. This method might just work, though it's not been tried, as far as I know. Anyway, wish you all the best with your experiment. Cheers, Bob H. ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 19:11:48 +0000 From: Gareth Whittock <whiteoak@dial.pipex.com> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: LOADS OF DELAY LINES Message-ID: <36E6C3F4.1370A05A@dial.pipex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > What is your soundcard with "loads of separate stereo delay lines" and 8 >ins > and outs? You can use several cards to produce more than plain stereo ins and outs or one of the many multiple cards on the market. The delay lines, loopers, filters are just free VST plugins that you get off the net. The thing that hangs it all together is Audiomulch software - the new version of which, (.8b1) allows me to bring delays in and out control filters. mixing etc etc from my midi pedals and switches. For instance I had 4 stereo loopers operated from midi switches with the speed controlled by a midi pedal and direction from another pedal. It was absolute bedlam of course but plenty of loopers seem to thrive on chaos. Audiomulch is still at its beta stage but imo it's a phenomenal piece of software. I can't put it down. It's this particular loopers delight :) Gareth ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:59:13 EST From: ENAT21213@aol.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: questions Message-ID: <f94d0253.36e6cf11@aol.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit question 1.......one more time...........anyone out there have alto music's phone # handy? Seriously thinking about purchasing an echoplex. question 2.......the $560.00 price tag if of course that's what alto is still selling them for.......does that include the footpedal? question 3.......if the footpedal is not included how much is alto selling them for? take care everyone, brian electric bird noise sound samples etc. at: http://members.aol.com/ebnoise/index.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:25:23 -0600 From: "Mike McGary" <mcgary@metronet.com> To: <Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com> Subject: RE: loop subtraction Message-ID: <000801be6b2b$bea80240$526ad0d0@Ugh> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > To me, what you're describing is a sort of "multi-track" looper. I > know, for example, I could never duplicate a part accurately enough to > "subtract" it out. Of course, any artifacts from the process might be > interesting of themselves. Actually, the artifacts are the key to the process. It's not a 'pure' subraction (not removing the exact sounds that were part of the base) but a different way of building new layers. For instance...you might play a gritty major chord into a loop.... By playing the major third in 'subtraction' mode the third is slowly backed out of the mix (roughly)...and then playing a minor third...the loop just changed feel. This could be a slow organic process...not like switching tracks on and off. -Mike McGary ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:51:11 -0800 From: Kim Flint <kflint@atitech.com> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com, "BOB HENRY" <BOBH@knme1.unm.edu> Subject: Re: Loopers-Delight-d Digest V99 #92 Message-Id: <2.2.32.19990310195111.008c0540@pop.chromatic.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" At 10:59 AM 3/10/99 GMT+7, BOB HENRY wrote: >(Bob H. reply to Javier Miranda V.) > >Are you some kind of IDEOT or what??? You go right ahead and >"Highly Object" to what I said. Fact is, that little tight-holed >anus-sphincker boys such as yourself have such a little mind, that >you had to take offense at a statement that I made. please calm down. we don't act this way here. That's what usenet is for. :-) It's a very easy thing to hold rational, intelligent debates without making needless personal attacks. Please keep that in mind when posting here. kim _________________________________________________________ Kim Flint, MTS kflint@atitech.com ATI Research 408-752-9284 ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 11:48:07 -0800 From: Chris Chovit <cho@newdream.net> To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: loop subtraction Message-Id: <v03130301b30c7b188632@[128.149.26.34]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Interesting....It seems like you would have to do a FFT to do this, which would probably best be done in the digital domain, and require some serious processing power to perform it in real time... Perhaps there would be a way to just make the "subtrating signal" out of phase with the main signal, and this might create a similar effect, as the signals would cancel each other. I can imagine the usefulness of this....loops can get pretty busy, and you could "thin it out" using this method. Maybe it could be done within an echoplex: have an insert mode = "subtract", in addition to the reverse and other insert modes. Kim, any new versions of the software in the planning stages? - Chris >Just a thought.... > >Long ago I worked with an FFT that would show you a >graphical depiction of the current sound source (SoundForge >has this in their 4.5 version). One of the features of the >hardware FFT was the ability to 'subtract' sounds. If you >had a sound that had an overpowering 600hz section, you could >put it in subtract mode...play a 600hz sound....and the >resulting sound was the original minus the 600hz sound >(kind of a follow-me EQ...) > >Wouldn't it be slick to have a looping device that allowed >this? You start a base pattern....play some parts on top of it >and build it's thickness....and then 'subtract' out the base pattern >by playing it again. > >(excuse my ignorance if there is already a device like this and everybody >already knows about it....slap me if my echoplex already does it) > > -Mike McGary ----------------------------- Chris Chovit cho@newdream.net ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 12:42:06 -0800 From: landman@wco.com (Mark Landman) To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: loop subtraction Message-Id: <v01540b00b30c8824048c@[207.20.235.76]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >Mike McGary wrote: >> >> Wouldn't it be slick to have a looping device that allowed >> this? You start a base pattern....play some parts on top of it >> and build it's thickness....and then 'subtract' out the base pattern >> by playing it again. > If you had an exact duplicate of your original base pattern, inverted it's amplitude, and mixed it at 50% with the loop, while playing it back precisely in time/phase with the base pattern, that would do the trick. Kinda hard to do though=8A This brings up the interesting question of how to "bring the loop back down", it's easy to quickly build a formidable wall of sound, but much harder to elegantly thin it out=8A DSP filters and processes in the feedback loop would do this, as well as multi-track loopers. Any other suggestions for ways to do this? Mark ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:11:53 EST From: ENAT21213@aol.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: jamman in stereo? Message-ID: <89268c48.36e6d209@aol.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit any one tried to sync up two jammen? will they sync up? will the slave unit respond to the master unit's commands (tap,layer,mute,etc.,etc)? take care, brian electric bird noise sound samples etc. at: http://members.aol.com/ebnoise/index.html ------------------------------ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 15:36:46 -0500 From: Edward_Chang@amsinc.com To: Loopers-Delight@annihilist.com Subject: Re: Great music from Crevice Message-ID: <85256730.00709FEE.00@ams-central-gate-5a.amsinc.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hey Rob Got the CD you sent - Great package! Thanks alot. Been too busy on other things to do much recording in a awhile, so it was interesting to hear our versions, a real blast from the past. Good luck and keep in touch, hopefully we can work together again one day... Ed Chang -------------------------------- End of Loopers-Delight-d Digest V99 Issue #96 *********************************************