Support |
Once I used a small looping/soundmaking device I called "the shoebox" due to its size and shape. I was accustomed to working with my more eleborate machines and maybe was nervous that what was a pretty big gig for me (the Kitchen here in NYC) might come off as too sonically limited, so I fed a tape of prepared sounds into the box for "transformations" along with the realtime stuff. Now this was very experimental/noise/soundscape material--not the obvious instrumentalist with invisible band thing--and the audience didn't really have a clue. People raved about the performance, and I even got asked for my autograph (unheard of in this sort of music!), but I felt crummy about it. I did this twice but would not do it again. I think that in purely electronic music, it is enough to ask that an audience find enjoyment in watching someone produce sounds largely disconnected from physical gestures; for pre-existing sounds to play a large part in the performance seems like cheating. Oddly perhaps, my audience did not feel that way--but I did feel as though I cheated; something was spoiled for me. In this situation, the audience should get something special; I feel I should be able to say "no one will hear these sounds in this shape ever again". But I suppose that applies only to my sort of "abstract electronics"? David Myers