Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: boomerang vs. headrush



I've got both.  Definitely if you can afford the Boomerang, it's a much
better looper than the headrush.

        Kevin


Kevin Goldsmith                         kevin@unitcircle.com
Unit Circle Media                       http://www.unitcircle.com/

On Fri, 6 Aug 1999 Jax1723@aol.com wrote:

> I don't want to start any wars but I was all set to buy a Headrush but 
>now it 
> seems possible  (if i work a little overtime) for me to get a boomerang. 
> 
> what i want to know  is since the rang is at least twice the money is it 
> twice as good as looper?  i don't care about the headrush's tape 
> simulation... i want a good looper that's easy to use live with a simple 
> guitar set up (no midi or anything).  i know this subject has come up 
>before 
> but there seems to be a lot of mixed views as of late.  Anyone own both? 
> Is 
> the rang worth the extra bucks?  (what should i expect to pay for the 
>rang?)
> 
> thanks in advance 
> jack
>