Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
Perhaps Kim has a good sense of humour as well as being a constant source of education for us. I thought it was funny and enjoyed it. Regards Steven ----- Original Message ----- From: Javier Miranda V. <gnominus@earthling.net> To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2000 6:14 PM Subject: RE: Echoplex=crap for dummies > I gotta say that Kim shows off a reptilian cool here with Italo (talk about > flames!). You Kim are an iceberg of incomprefuckhensible proportions! I > would have lost my cool right off the bat. But not Kim. > > Congrats, Kim. You're a gentleman and a scholar. Not at all bad for a > shorty. > > Hmm... Maybe Italo would benefit from a video explaining and >demostrating > all the great features of the Echoplex. I'm sure that would shut him up. > > J. > > | -----Original Message----- > | From: Kim Flint [mailto:kflint@loopers-delight.com] > | Sent: Monday 07 August 2000 12:44 AM > | To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > | Subject: Re: Echoplex=crap for dummies > | > | > | At 6:07 PM -0700 8/6/00, italo de angelis wrote: > | >It's almost 4 years that you all guys are pathetically talking > | about this > | >shitty box!!! Can you stop it? > | ... > | >Start writing to Scott Gilfix at Eventide (scottg@eventide.com) to have > | >properly designed software for looping into their outstanding > | boxes, come > | >ON!!! Fed up with this poor old ladies junk talk be MODERN!!! > | >ITALO > | > | I talked to Scott at length about looping on Orville. It's an > | amazing box > | for signal processing, but you may be interested to know that it has > | fundamental architecture limitations that prevent it from doing > | many of the > | basic functions of the Echoplex. (as I understood it.) It > | doesn't do the > | stuff that is time based and revolves around direct access to > | the data. No > | multiply, no insert, no multiple loops and related functions, > | no multiple > | undo's, limited sync possibilities, etc. It has "sampler mode" > | and "looper > | mode" but can't do the interesting stuff that combines the two > | concepts. If > | you want tons of signal processing power and great algorithms, > | and you want > | to use those in conjunction with basic looping functions (and you >have a > | spare $6000 or whatever it costs) it seems like a pretty good > | choice. Can > | it replace an echoplex? or even a jamman? no. it's a different beast. > | > | kim > | > | >______________________________________________________________________ > | Kim Flint | Looper's Delight > | kflint@loopers-delight.com | http://www.loopers-delight.com > | > | > | > >