Support |
rich (11:51 AM 09.11.2000) wrote: >>Electrix has a good handle on what makes something music *and* useful in >a >>production environment. I have a ton of delay lines, but I gotta say that >>I've been having the most fun with the MoFx. The combination of neat >little >>touches and the presentation packaging makes the box just a joy to use. > >agreed. did it seem like i was slagging on the company? gee wilikers, >i've feel like i've been going over the top talking about their >products... Nah, sorry... I was aiming for my own clarification on what you may of meant by saying that the products were "packaged" better. I wanted to push that line out farther and say that it's not just a _physical_ packaging issue (which is what I thought you were talking about). >it's just that what the Repeater is claiming to do is quite complex, and >implementation of complex dsp doesn't always come in the simplest user >interface, as some EDP users can attest, as well as the Max/Kyma/Orville >contingency. Yeup, I agree. I think they have it right though. Because... >Electrix products, IMO, shine through simple, well designed user >interface... ...they don't want to screw up people being able to make this statement. :) >So we shall see how this puppy pans out. My biggest question is: why are >they not releasing the footpedal at the same time as the unit? They >mention the 3-button footswitch for their other products that has never >surfaced. Is there potential for the same thing to happen to the >Repeater? Dunno. But Damon has said that _everything_ on the Repeater is available to MIDI, so there may be something more than a 3-button in the works. Mark _______________________________________________________ |_) _ _||\/| _ _ ._ evolutionary electronica | \(/_(_|| |(_)(_)| | www.redmoon-music.com _______________________________________________________