Support |
exactly! i've used all kinds of looping hardware in the past, even two revox's with a tape loop a la frippertronics. from what i understand about the repeater, it will be pretty well the ultimate stand-alone looping tool ever. so i am willing to wait. i am willing to wait a few weeks, a month, even two months but we are going on 5 months since i was told i would have one in hand after putting a deposit down on it. hence my impatience. plus that fact that electrix/ivl isn't setting firm delivery dates and the unofficial ones keep slipping. brett At 11:53 PM 8/2/2001, Mark wrote: >True, true, true.... however, I'm sure I'm not the only one on the list >that feels >that part of their craft IS gear wrangling? The glee of a new vocoder, >or >heavily >modified Speak and Spell, or even something as lo-tech as a new Tibetan >singing >bowl. Striking a balance between the spontaneity that a new "toy" can >help along >and the depth of creativity that can only be obtained through intimacy >with one's >gear, is the real trick. > >Is it wrong to long for a stereo looper? Than I don't want to be right. > >Mark > >stanitarium@earthlink.net wrote: > > > i concur and in the words of a great painter: "adapt yourself to the > > contents of the paintbox"-paul klee > > > > stanner > > > > > From: Hedewa7@aol.com > > > > > anyways: > > > don't most folks here have at least one looper, awready? > > > w/music technology, i've -personally- found it to be a grievous > > > (psychological) error to base the direction/quantity of present & >future > > > output upon products that are still TBR. > > > (like: 'i'm not gonna write a blahblahblah-kinda piece, until Apple > puts out > > > a triple-1.27 gHz machine', etc etc.....) > > > i've found that my 'consumer-in-abeyance' attitude -when it becomes > dominant- > > > usually delays insight/exploration of *whatever* tools i have at > hand..... > > > > > just some thawts. > > > looking forward to a fully-functional repeater's imminent arrival! > > > aw, shucks, > > > dt / s-c > > >