Support |
Kim explains: > >I think it is very interesting that Matthias, who defines himself >musically as an improvisor and brought this topic up, is also the >main inventor of the Echoplex. It is interesting to see how one >affects the other; Matthias' needs for being able to use and >manipulate loops in a very spontaneous way during improvisation has >very much to do with why the echoplex works the way it does. And >using the echoplex for years in improvisational looping continues to >inspire ideas for the next generation of it. He created tools to >solve his problems and meet his needs. Or perhaps you could say, he >created a given set of improvisational looping techniques and then >created the instrument to enable him to do it in real time. To be more acurate: in the first year I implemented what I needed. Then the other 7 years, I implemented what other users needed (with the exeption of the new SyncRec function in the upgrade - which similarely worked in my units since '94, but was not mature :-) It helps a lot for improvising with partners) >The loop space gets all filled up and layered deeper and deeper and >it turns into the giant wall of sound loop that demolishes >everything in it's path. And then they don't know what to do with >that, so at the end they just turn it off, which for me as a >listener is rather like running through a very thick and noisy fog >and then suddenly colliding with a brick wall. brilliant picture, Kim! >Move past the idea of an immutable loop that gets saved and recalled >and triggered and repeated but never itself changes, to where the >actual process of creating and changing the loop itself becomes the >form and then the music.... thats it! -- ---> http://Matthias.Grob.org