Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
> > Andy > > I was able to replicate morphing putting two algorithms together in the > > same patch and X- fading between them. Now, I know Vortex claims that > > morphing is different from X- fade but I'm not sure if it does one or > > the other. I would think it does more X-fade than real morphing. > Italo > > Vortex does more than just X- fade, all the parameters gradually changing from > one algo to the other. This works for the same algo in A & B, allowing ,say, > depth and speed of vibrato to both change smoothly. (which would be easy on > the orville). > (although I notice that the Vortex cheats on filter frequencies, and d oes do > an X-fade even when morphing to the same algo) > It also morphs smoothly between different algos, in which case some pa rams > will head off to a "hidden" value (which I think is always either 1 or 64). > Morphing echoes is not like an X- fade, as the audio that is looping is > transfered from one algo to another. again this happens when the echo algo is > the same with just different times, or if changing between very differ ent > echo algos. > > So what happens during a Morph can be much more complex than an X- fade, > and indeed the sounds/textures produced certainly can benefit from thi s. > (although there's little hint of this in the factory presets) > > Of course the advantage of the Vortex is that you can work out any 2 s ounds > that you like , then have the (almost) instant gratification of morphi ng > between them. > (without having to spend hours of programming) > > > So as yet , nothing compares to a Vortex:-) > > > Mind you , if I had an Orville. > > andy like nothing compares to Orville!!! Italo > > > > > > ___________________________________________ EVENTIDE AUDIO CUSTOMERS SUPPORT italo@eventide.com