Support |
on 1/26/02 12:18 AM, Kim Flint at kflint@loopers-delight.com wrote: > hmm? > if "length of feature list" is important, the EDP in fact has far more > features and loop functions than the Repeater. Our incomplete manual is > more than twice as long as their incomplete manual. :-) Here are the "features" I was thinking about on the Repeater: * Stereo * Effects loop (which can be switched in position thereby reducing the need for a mixer, Switchblade, etc.) * Higher sample rate (which ought to translate into somewhat better audio specs) * Pitch/Tempo shifting. That doesn't matter as much to me but I've seen various uses of the Repeater based around playing extensively with pitch shifting. * A nice, solid feel to the knobs and switches (though I guess that gets balanced against having an external power supply -- a point that surprises me since the Mo-FX has an internal power supply) In constrast, the better live looping features of the EDP are harder to explain except to people who have been working reasonably extensively with looping. Mark