Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info
[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

RE: Loop approach: Loop as effect

My take is that effects manipulate timbre and tone, while looping
manipulates performance.  

-----Original Message-----
From: Kim Flint [mailto:kflint@loopers-delight.com]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 2:35 PM
To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
Subject: Re: Loop approach: Loop as effect


At 11:57 AM 7/22/2002, Mark Sottilaro wrote:
>I'm not sure how you can say this.  It's generally accepted that "delay"
>is an effect, no?  I've got a ton of gear that lists the type of effects
>and "delay" is usually one of them.  Is a loop not essentially a long
>delay with a 100% feedback?

if that is all you do with looping, then yes, for you loops are just an 
effect. You would not be interacting with it at all, just using it as 
accompaniment. sort of like karaoke.

kim


______________________________________________________________________
Kim Flint                     | Looper's Delight
kflint@loopers-delight.com    | http://www.loopers-delight.com