Looper's Delight Archive Top (Search)
Date Index
Thread Index
Author Index
Looper's Delight Home
Mailing List Info

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: sample based looping vs. delay looping



Thanks you guys.  I was indeed using a pure sine (kinda just as a test for
my filter factory) and certainly the unit does seem to produce really nice
loops from more dynamic material.   Now that I think about it, I did a
little voice drone experimentation with it when I first got it and didn't
notice a problem.   I was using a way low end sine last night and maybe
frequency plays a part in producing the undesirable effects.   I'm glad to
hear that it wasn't just me and I'll try some other drony input. Maybe try 
a
slip work-around on my low end stuff?

thanx,
lance


----- Original Message -----
From: "Goddess" <thefates@earthlink.net>
To: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 08, 2002 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: sample based looping vs. delay looping


>   <smile>  I don't know, -I'm pretty darn good at hearing artifacts.
lol!
>  -I do alot of it for a living.  and while I do know that the Repeater
does
> produce them going in and out of recording and switching from forward to
> reverse and vice versa, with the method I used, I really don't hear them.
> I've also done it with guitar and synth, so the pitches are pretty
> constant.  <smile>  -which method did you use to record your sound?
>   Anyway, thanks for the note.  regarding the sender's original point, of
> the differences between sampling vs delay based loopers, do you have any
> insights?
>
> Smiles,
>
> CQ
>
> At 09:32 AM 8/8/02 -0700, you wrote:
> >Since I rarely do drones that have little variation, I had never come
> >across this at all, but recently, I hit the Repeater with a sine wave to
> >see what the fuss was all about.  I did hear a little bump at some point
> >in the loop.  I was amazed that so much fuss was being made about it,
> >but then again, I'm not trying to achieve a featureless drone in any of
> >the music I do.    I can't imagine you could keep your voice as a pure
> >single note without inflection long enough to hear the bump that people
> >have complained about, but it's surely there, and I imagine annoying if
> >you're going for a certain sound.
> >
> >Mark Sottilaro
> >
> >On Thursday, August 8, 2002, at 09:18  AM, Goddess wrote:
> >>   The method I usually use is to record a blank loop
> >> and then simply overdub to create seamless drones.  -And I'm not
getting
> >> any artifacting.
> >
> >
>
>
> ---
>
>   "The only things I really think are important, are love, and eachother.
> -Then, anything is possible..."
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~thefates
>
> Please visit The Guitar Cafe.
>
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/the-guitar-cafe
>
>