[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index]

Re: The Legendary Electro-Harmonix 16 Second Delay

To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com
From: "ernesto schnack" <schnack@mailbolt.com>
Subject: Re: The Legendary Electro-Harmonix 16 Second Delay
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 04:43:35 UT

On Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:12:07 -0700, "Marklar" <sine@zerocrossing.net>
said:
> OK, what I should have said, was that some of us decided that the EH16
> was a
> unique box, but David Torn and Weg don't think this at all.

or maybe that "some of us decided that the Marklar was a unique
Marklar, but Marklar and Marklar don't think this at all."

:P
Marklar


-- 
ernesto schnack
http://schnack.does.it

-- 
http://fastmail.fm
 - In the time it takes you to read this, you could be FastMailing

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Legendary Electro-Harmonix 16 Second Delay
  - From: jim palmer <jimp@pobox.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Critique of Critique of Feedback at Max
Next by Date: Re: one guitar played therw four guitar amps.
Previous by Thread: Re: The Legendary Electro-Harmonix 16 Second Delay
Next by Thread: Re: The Legendary Electro-Harmonix 16 Second Delay
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread
- Author