Support |
Per wrote: > You might also try: > > "Practice / practice even harder / forget it all / get up there and > play" ;-) Well said! I like "up there" as an all-encompassing phrase. Although it immediately brings forth the image of a stage, it could be a state of being: I am no longer down here, I am up there. Nemoguitt wrote: >i yearn to play with other musicians but it never happens..... What I find fascinating about the transition from practice to rehersal is that, in rehersal, I am outside myself. I become my own critical listener. I am playing what I've practiced, but with an objective ear examining whether I am getting "up there." I practice for myself, but I rehearse for my other self as I would for another musician. I am still not playing "for the world," as a performance would be. >99.9% i play by myself with my boxes, sometimes to an audience.....playing (looping) whatever it is that i do is turning more and more into a crap shoot, i roll dem bones and step on record and i'm off.....so i dont know if there is a difference between: practice, rehearse, perform.....to me its all kismet/zietgiest..... But I doubt if you would choose to "practice" when you are ostensibly performing for an audience: "hmmm. Maybe I should see if I can introduce exactly one new note every minute for my entire set. Maybe I should rewire my looper thingie so it comes before my atomic effects atomizer thingie, then route it back into the looper thingie with just a touch of feedback. Maybe I should play this new microtonal bass, even though I've never even held it before." Nomsane? And David wrote: >There are three other modes used to bring music into this world: we also, beg, borrow and steal! And, do I detect some borrowing here... :-) Yes, when I was playing with The Wes Houston Band, circa 1979-80, one musician was relentlessly practicing his part as the others sat about. It was supposed to be a rehersal. Wes announced with excellent authority: "Hey! Practice at home! This is a rehersal! We've got a gig tonight!" I've used it ever since to sort out what was/is attempting to be accomplished. >You are of course correct in what you say, however. Thank you! And Greg House wrote: >While it's nice if your playing is effortless, but along the lines of the other thread I was just writing on, it can make for a more interesting performance if your looping appears LESS effortless. And, wiseass that I am, I have an aphorism about appearance. "Music is the performance of sound; theater is the performance of appearance." Many musicians add theater to their performances. Some even do so intentionally! ciao for now Douglas Baldwin, coyote-at-large coyotelk@optonline.net