Support
Looper's Delight
|
Support |
|
|
DOD had one (FX96) at about 500ms. It used a single 3005. Funny thing, I had one and would run it on this really poorly regulated supply...it must have altered the clock as it would pump out delays of well over a second Note : what came out was very weird, it was an echo -- but it was very distorted (not overdrive / clipping distorted or simply low-frequency from the slow clock) you've got a couple of options I guess - chain 2 BBD's together (you'll get some loss from twice the buckets) lower the clock speed (changes sampling rate and will restrict the frequency response, it might also start sounding "grainy") From: "mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net> Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Subject: long analog delay Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543) Received: from mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.253.17]) by mc7-s14.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:44:30 -0800 Received: from hemlock.violacea.com ([207.228.238.9]) by mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:44:29 -0800 Received: (from looper@localhost)by hemlock.violacea.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA31711;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500 Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500 Old-Return-Path: <monk@fuse.net> In-Reply-To: <00b301c2c257$f50f5040$69894682@lance> Message-Id: <3BB51D2C-2E4A-11D7-AC4B-000393073870@fuse.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543) Resent-Message-ID: <88HQbC.A.ZvH.PKwL-@hemlock.violacea.com> Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> archive/latest/29008 X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com Precedence: list Resent-Sender: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com Return-Path: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 20:44:29.0984 (UTC) FILETIME=[0F9F5A00:01C2C257] does anyone know of a longish (850 ms +) analog delay? i'm thinking about trying to have the memory modified to go twice as long.. just curious. i'm of course leaving out the highly regarded but insanely priced EH 16sec delay. 1 second would be enough for me. i have the ubiquitous DL4 and although i do like it, the memory man is the least realistic of all the delays IMHO... thanks _________________________________________________________________ MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus