Support |
can you add another bucket brigade to a memory man? is there a tech who will do this? On Wednesday, January 22, 2003, at 04:45 PM, James Winger wrote: > DOD had one (FX96) at about 500ms. It used a single 3005. > > Funny thing, I had one and would run it on this really poorly > regulated supply...it must have altered the clock as it would pump out > delays of well over a second > Note : what came out was very weird, it was an echo -- but it was very > distorted (not overdrive / clipping distorted or simply low-frequency > from the slow clock) > > you've got a couple of options I guess - chain 2 BBD's together > (you'll get some loss from twice the buckets) > > lower the clock speed (changes sampling rate and will restrict the > frequency response, it might also start sounding "grainy") > > > > > > From: "mr.monk" <monk@fuse.net> > Reply-To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > To: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > Subject: long analog delay > Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500 > MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543) > Received: from mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com ([65.54.253.17]) by > mc7-s14.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, > 22 Jan 2003 12:44:30 -0800 > Received: from hemlock.violacea.com ([207.228.238.9]) by > mc7-f10.law1.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.5600); Wed, > 22 Jan 2003 12:44:29 -0800 > Received: (from looper@localhost)by hemlock.violacea.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) > id PAA31711;Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500 > Resent-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 15:43:59 -0500 > Old-Return-Path: <monk@fuse.net> > In-Reply-To: <00b301c2c257$f50f5040$69894682@lance> > Message-Id: <3BB51D2C-2E4A-11D7-AC4B-000393073870@fuse.net> > X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543) > Resent-Message-ID: <88HQbC.A.ZvH.PKwL-@hemlock.violacea.com> > Resent-From: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > X-Mailing-List: <Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com> > archive/latest/29008 > X-Loop: Loopers-Delight@loopers-delight.com > Precedence: list > Resent-Sender: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com > Return-Path: Loopers-Delight-request@loopers-delight.com > X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2003 20:44:29.0984 (UTC) > FILETIME=[0F9F5A00:01C2C257] > > does anyone know of a longish (850 ms +) analog delay? i'm thinking > about trying to have the memory modified to go twice as long.. just > curious. i'm of course leaving out the highly regarded but insanely > priced EH 16sec delay. 1 second would be enough for me. i have the > ubiquitous DL4 and although i do like it, the memory man is the least > realistic of all the delays IMHO... > > > thanks > > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus >